Electronic exchanges excited-state

Figure Al.6.24. Schematic representation of a photon echo in an isolated, multilevel molecule, (a) The initial pulse prepares a superposition of ground- and excited-state amplitude, (b) The subsequent motion on the ground and excited electronic states. The ground-state amplitude is shown as stationary (which in general it will not be for strong pulses), while the excited-state amplitude is non-stationary. (c) The second pulse exchanges ground- and excited-state amplitude, (d) Subsequent evolution of the wavepackets on the ground and excited electronic states. Wlien they overlap, an echo occurs (after [40]).

According to Eq. (A.4), if < 0, the ground state will be the in-phase combination, and the out-of-phase one, an excited state. On the other hand, if > 0, the ground state will be the out-of-phase combination, while the in-phase one is an excited state. This conclusion is far reaching, since it means that the electronic wave function of the ground state is nonsymmetric in this case, in contrast with common chemical intuition. We show that when an even number of electron pairs is exchanged, this is indeed the case, so that the transition state is the out-of-phase combination. 

In a regime of strong interaction between the chains no optical coupling between the ground slate and the lowest excited state occurs. The absence of coupling, however, has a different origin. Indeed, below 7 A, the LCAO coefficients start to delocalize over the two chains and the wavefunclions become entirely symmetric below 5 A due to an efficient exchange of electrons between the chains. This delocalization of the wavcfunclion is not taken into account in the molecular exciton model, which therefore becomes unreliable at short chain separations. Analysis of the one-electron structure of the complexes indicates that the... 

The decomposition of dioxetanone may involve the chemically initiated electron-exchange luminescence (CIEEL) mechanism (McCapra, 1977 Koo et al., 1978). In the CIEEL mechanism, the singlet excited state amide anion is formed upon charge annihilation of the two radical species that are produced by the decomposition of dioxetanone. According to McCapra (1997), however, the mechanism has various shortfalls if it is applied to bioluminescence reactions. It should also be pointed out that the amide anion of coelenteramide can take various resonance structures involving the N-C-N-C-O linkage, even if it is not specifically mentioned. 

Schuster, G. B. (1979). Chemiluminescence of organic peroxides. Conversion of ground-state reactants to excited-state products by chemically initiated electron-exchange luminescence mechanism. Acc. Chem. Res. 12 366-373. 

We conclude with a consideration of a few other cobalt self-exchange reactions. The reaction in Eq. (9.33) is faster than that involving the ammine complexes (Eq. 9.30) because the water is a weaker-field ligand than ammonia. Thus, the activation energy for the formation of the electronically excited states is lower, as is the change in Co-ligand distances in the two oxidation states. 

For the fate of the excited states in condensed media, we must add to this list energy transfer processes. These are broadly classified as radiative (or trivial ), coulombic (mainly dipole-dipole interaction), or electron-exchange processes. 

---