Electron spin electrostatic forces

The magnetic forces between electrons are negligibly small compared to the electrostatic forces, and they are of no importance in determining the distribution of the electrons in a molecule and therefore in the formation of chemical bonds. The only forces that are important in determining the distribution of electrons in atoms and molecules, and therefore in determining their properties, are the electrostatic forces between electrons and nuclei. Nevertheless electron spin plays a very important role in chemical bonding through the Pauli principle, which we discuss next. It provides the fundamental reason why electrons in molecules appear to be found in pairs as Lewis realized but could not explain. 

In the structures VI to X, all the electrons are paired, so that the total spin angular momentum is zero. These structures may therefore resonate with each other and it is important to appreciate that, although certain GN groups, for example in formula X, are represented as being in the ionic state and therefore bound to the central iron atom by electrostatic forces, all the GN groups are attached to the central atom by the same type of bond which is in part ionic, in part a or bond and in part a tt bond. The pairing of spins also explains the diamagnetic character of this substance. 

As we discovered in the last section the spin and. space parts of the eigenfunctions are separately invariant under transformations of the sphere group. The electrostatic forces separate states having different L, and the possible values of S are determined by the Pauli exclusion principle. Although the many-electron Hamiltonian in Eq. 7.18.8 does not contain the spin coordinates—it is therefore invariant under all transformations involving one or more of the electron spin coordinates— the eigenfunctions of 3C do contain spin coordinates. The spin coordinate electron function /(x, y, 2, [Pg.114]

The exchange interaction between valence electrons in these metals results in aligning their spins, so the spins of these electrons tend to line up. The exchange force is stronger than the opposite electrostatic force. 

The EDM r/e,p,nu of an electron, proton, or neutron is neccessarily aligned along the spin direction a of the particle. In essence, an EDM measurement in an atom or molecule involves polarizing the system with an applied external electric field and searching for the interaction E between the electronic or nuclear EDM and the polarized atom/molecule. Schiff s theorem [18] states that q = 0 if the atom/molecule is made of point particles bound by electrostatic forces. In other words, the electronic or nuclear EDM does not see the applied field because it is shielded out by the other charged particles. This theorem is important for its loopholes nuclei are not point particles and the electric dipole interaction is not screened when the electrons are relativistic. Consequently, q is not zero if the atom/molecule is well chosen [19,20]. Eor example the best measurement of the proton EDM comes from a measurement on TIE molecules [21], where the large size of the T1 nucleus ends up giving q 1 for the nuclear spin EDM interaction. The upper limit on the neutron EDM is known both directly, from measurements on free neutrons [22], and indirectly from nuclear spin measurements on Hg atoms [23]. 

It is well at this stage to recall the basic premise of the VSEPR approach the electron pairs are similar in energy and repel by either simple electrostatic forces or by the Pauli exclusion principle (75). Within the d-block transition metals, this implies that the 4s, 4p, and 3d electrons should be of similar energy if the model is to work. We know that this is not true, and certainly the energy differences will be greater for metals like Sc, Ti, Zr, Zn, and Hg (27). Worse and different problems exist for the elements Rh, Ir, Pd, Pt, and Au, which exhibit the robust square planar 16-electron structure and which participate in oxidative addition and r uctive elimination reactions. Similarly, the geometry of the common low-spin square planar d compounds of Ni(II) (like Ni(DMG)2 and [Ni(CN)4] "), which do not obey the EAN rule, cannot be deduced from the VSEPR approach. 

ABSTRACT. Calculation of the rate constant at several temperatures for the reaction +(2p) HCl X are presented. A quantum mechanical dynamical treatment of ion-dipole reactions which combines a rotationally adiabatic capture and centrifugal sudden approximation is used to obtain rotational state-selective cross sections and rate constants. Ah initio SCF (TZ2P) methods are employed to obtain the long- and short-range electronic potential energy surfaces. This study indicates the necessity to incorporate the multi-surface nature of open-shell systems. The spin-orbit interactions are treated within a semiquantitative model. Results fare better than previous calculations which used only classical electrostatic forces, and are in good agreement with CRESU and SIFT measurements at 27, 68, and 300 K. ... 

---