Electron density spin relaxation

Based on the foregoing discussion, one might suppose that the Fukui function is nothing more than a DFT-inspired restatement of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory. This is not quite true. Because DFT is, in principle, exact, the Fukui function includes effects—notably electron correlation and orbital relaxation—that are a priori neglected in an FMO approach. This is most clear when the electron density is expressed in terms of the occupied Kohn-Sham spin-orbitals [16],... 

This mechanism is identical to the one arising from the contact interaction between an unpaired electron and a nuclear spin (41). In that case, the hyperfine coupling (generally denoted by Asc or A and exists only if the electron density is non-zero at the considered nucleus, hence the terminology of contact ) replaces the J coupling and the earlier statement (i) may be untrue because it so happens that T becomes very short. In that case, dispersion curves provide some information about electronic relaxation. These points are discussed in detail in Section II.B of Chapter 2 and I.A.l of Chapter 3. 

Fig. 3. Variation of the completely reduced dipole-dipole spectral density (see text) for the model of a low-symmetry complex for S = 3/2. Reprinted from J. Magn. Reson., vol. 59,Westlund, RO. Wennerstrom, H. Nordenskiold, L. Kowalewski, J. Benetis, N., Nuclear Spin-Lattice and Spin-Spin Relaxation in Paramagnetic Systems in the Slow-Motion Regime for Electron Spin. III. Dipole-Dipole and Scalar Spin-Spin Interaction for S = 3/2 and 5/2 , pp. 91-109, Copyright 1984, with permission from Elsevier.

Bertini and co-workers 119) and Kruk et al. 96) formulated a theory of electron spin relaxation in slowly-rotating systems valid for arbitrary relation between the static ZFS and the Zeeman interaction. The unperturbed, static Hamiltonian was allowed to contain both these interactions. Such an unperturbed Hamiltonian, Hq, depends on the relative orientation of the molecule-fixed P frame and the laboratory frame. For cylindrically symmetric ZFS, we need only one angle, p, to specify the orientation of the two frames. The eigenstates of Hq(P) were used to define the basis set in which the relaxation superoperator Rzpsi ) expressed. The superoperator M, the projection vectors and the electron-spin spectral densities cf. Eqs. (62-64)), all become dependent on the angle p. The expression in Eq. (61) needs to be modified in two ways first, we need to include the crossterms electron-spin spectral densities, and These terms can be... 

Sharp and Lohr proposed recently a somewhat different point of view on the relation between the electron spin relaxation and the PRE (126). They pointed out that the electron spin relaxation phenomena taking a nonequilibrium ensemble of electron spins (or a perturbed electron spin density operator) back to equilibrium, described in Eqs. (53) and (59) in terms of relaxation superoperators of the Redfield theory, are not really relevant for the PRE. In an NMR experiment, the electron spin density operator remains at, or very close to, thermal equilibrium. The pertinent electron spin relaxation involves instead the thermal decay of time correlation functions such as those given in Eq. (56). The authors show that the decay of the Gr(T) (r denotes the electron spin vector components) is composed of a sum of contributions... 

As in Eq. (64), the electron spin spectral densities could be evaluated by expanding the electron spin tensor operators in a Liouville space basis set of the static Hamiltonian. The outer-sphere electron spin spectral densities are more complicated to evaluate than their inner-sphere counterparts, since they involve integration over the variable u, in analogy with Eqs. (68) and (69). The main simplifying assumption employed for the electron spin system is that the electron spin relaxation processes can be described by the Redfield theory in the same manner as for the inner-sphere counterpart (95). A comparison between the predictions of the analytical approach presented above, and other models of the outer-sphere relaxation, the Hwang and Freed model (HF) (138), its modification including electron spin... 

Models for the outer-sphere PRE, allowing for faster rotational motion, have been developed, in analogy with the inner sphere approaches discussed in the Section V.C. The outer-sphere counterpart of the work by Kruk et al. 123) was discussed in the same paper. In the limit of very low magnetic field, the expressions for the outer-sphere PRE for slowly rotating systems 96,144) were found to remain valid for an arbitrary rotational correlation time Tr. New, closed-form expressions were developed for outer-sphere relaxation in the high-field limit. The Redfield description of the electron spin relaxation in terms of spectral densities incorporated into that approach, was valid as long as the conditions A t j 1 and 1 were fulfilled. The validity... 

Nevertheless, calculation of such properties as spin-dependent electronic densities near nuclei, hyperfine constants, P,T-parity nonconservation effects, chemical shifts etc. with the help of the two-component pseudospinors smoothed in cores is impossible. We should notice, however, that the above core properties (and the majority of other properties of practical interest which are described by the operators heavily concentrated within inner cores or on nuclei) are mainly determined by electronic densities of the valence and outer core shells near to, or on, nuclei. The valence shells can be open or easily perturbed by external fields, chemical bonding etc., whereas outer core shells are noticeably polarized (relaxed) in contrast to the inner core shells. Therefore, accurate calculation of electronic structure in the valence and outer core region is of primary interest for such properties. 

Unpaired electronic density can be delocalized onto the various nuclei of the complex via through-bond scalar hyperfine interactions involving occupied orbitals containing s-character (direct interaction or polarization according to the Fermi mechanism, Wertz and Bolton (1986)). Random electron relaxation thus produces a flip-flop mechanism which affects the nuclear spin and increases nuclear relaxation processes (Bertini and Luchinat, 1996). Since these interactions are isotropic, they do not depend on molecular tumbling and re is the only relevant correlation time for non-exchanging semi-rigid complexes. Moreover, only electronic spin can be delocalized via hyperfine interactions (no orbital contribution) and the contact re-... 

A widespread view is that the feature comes from some crossover in the electronic density of states (DOS). The main result of the present paper is that after a proper re-arrangement of the experimental data no PG feature exists in the 63 Cu nuclear spin relaxation time behaviour. Instead, the data show two independent parallel relaxation mechanisms a temperature independent one that we attribute to stripes caused by the presence of external dopants and an "universal temperature dependent term which turns out to be exactly the same as in the stoichiometric compound YBCO 124. 

---