Electron attachment field dependence

An interesting example of a diffusion-controlled reaction is electron attachment to SFg. Early studies showed that in -alkanes, k increases linearly with over a wide range of mobilities from 10 to 1 cm /Vs [119]. Another study of the effect of electric field E) showed that in ethane and propane, k is independent of E up to approximately 90 kV/cm, but increases at higher fields [105]. This field is also the onset of the supralinear field dependence of the electron mobility [120]. Thus over a wide range of temperature and electric field, the rate of attachment to SFg remains linearly dependent on the mobility of the electron, as required by Eq. (15). 

Now, depending only on a choice of basis and level of correlation just as for ground states, there are generalizations for the treatment of excited, ionized and electron-attached states [21, 26] and analytical gradients for such states [27] for the treatment of second- and higher-order properties, static [28] and frequency-dependent [29] for relativistic problems [30] for explicit r 2 CC theory [31] and for various multireference generalizations of CC theory [32]. In brief, CC theory has now assumed a dominant place in the field of quantum chernistry, and it started with the pioneering efforts of Jiri Cizek and Joe Paldus. 

Figure 26 Field dependence of electron attachment in TMSi. (Redrawn from the data of Bakale, G. and Beck, G., /. Chem. Phys, 84, 5344,1986.)...

So what about aromatic protons (<56.0-9.5) aldehyde protons (<59.5—9.6), or even protons oh double, nay triple bonds (<52.5-3.1) All these protons are attached to carbons with n bonds, double or triple bonds, or aromatic systems. The electrons in these n bonds generate their own little local magnetic field. This local field is not spherically symmetric — it can shield or deshield protons depending on where the protons are — it s anisotropic. In Fig. 137, the shielding regions have plusses on them, and deshielding regions have minuses. 

When rotation occurs about a bond there are two sources of strain energy. The first arises from the nonbonded interactions between the atoms attached to the two atoms of the bond (1,4-interactions) and these interactions are automatically included in most molecular mechanics models. The second source arises from reorganization of the electron density about the bonded atoms, which alters the degree of orbital overlap. The values for the force constants can be determined if a frequency for rotation about a bond in a model compound can be determined. For instance, the bond rotation frequencies of ethane and ethylamine have been determined by microwave spectroscopy. From the temperature dependence of the frequencies, the barriers to rotation have been determined as 12.1 and 8.28 kJ mol-1, respectively1243. The contribution to this barrier that arises from the nonbonded 1,4-interactions is then calculated using the potential functions to be employed in the force field. 

---