Reduction potentials electron acceptors

Fig. 3. The dependence of intramicellar electron transfer rate constant on the difference of the electron acceptor reduction potential and electron donor oxidation potential [104]...

Reduced forms function as electron donors and oxidized forms function as electron acceptors. Redox potential reflects the intensity of reduction, and it is a measure of electron activity, which is analogous to pH. 

Electron donor molecules are oxidized in solution easily. Eor example, for TTE is 0.33V vs SCE in acetonitrile. Similarly, electron acceptors such as TCNQ are reduced easily. TCNQ exhibits a reduction wave at — 0.06V vs SCE in acetonitrile. The redox potentials can be adjusted by derivatizing the donor and acceptor molecules, and this tuning of HOMO and LUMO levels can be used to tailor charge-transfer and conductivity properties of the material. Knowledge of HOMO and LUMO levels can also be used to choose materials for efficient charge injection from metallic electrodes. 

The standard electrode potentials , or the standard chemical potentials /X , may be used to calculate the free energy decrease —AG and the equilibrium constant /T of a corrosion reaction (see Appendix 20.2). Any corrosion reaction in aqueous solution must involve oxidation of the metal and reduction of a species in solution (an electron acceptor) with consequent electron transfer between the two reactants. Thus the corrosion of zinc ( In +zzn = —0-76 V) in a reducing acid of pH = 4 (a = 10 ) may be represented by the reaction ... 

Tabk 3. Reduction potentials for some electron acceptors... 

Synthetic electron acceptors have been shown to react very rapidly with free flavins The combination of a flavin with an apoenzyme often inhibits the reaction with certain electron acceptors. The reaction with an electron acceptor will be thermodynamically favored if its standard reduction potential is larger than that of the flavin. A list of electron acceptors along with their reduction potentials can be foimd in Table 3. 

The ET reaction between aqueous Fe(CN)g and the neutral species, TCNQ, has been investigated extensively with SECM, in parallel with microelectrochemical measurements at expanding droplets (MEMED) [84], which are discussed in Chapter 13. In the SECM studies, a Pt UME in the aqueous phase generated Fe(CN)g by reduction of Fe(CN)g. TCNQ was selected as the organic electron acceptor, because the half-wave potential for TCNQ ion transfer from DCE to water is 0.2 V more positive than that for ET from Fe(CN)g to TCNQ [85]. This meant that the measured kinetics were not compromised by TCNQ transfer from DCE to the aqueous phase within the potential window of these experiments. 

---