Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effective bond length ratios

Earlandite structure, 6,849 Edge-coalesced icosahedra eleven-coordinate compounds, 1, 99 repulsion energy coefficients, 1,33,34 Edta — see Acetic acid, ethylenediaminetetra-Effective atomic number concept, 1,16 Effective bond length ratios non-bonding electron pairs, 1,37 Effective d-orbital set, 1,222 Egta — see Acetic acid,... [Pg.125]

Valence shell electron pair repulsion theory, 1,32-39 effective bond length ratios, 1.34 halogenium species, 3, 312 noble gas compounds, 3,312 repulsion energy coefficient, 1, 33 Valency... [Pg.243]

M—i and the metal-ligand bond M—j is determined by the effective bond length ratio , R itf). These empirical parameters can be successfully transferred from one stereochemistry to another, and even between different coordination numbers. [Pg.35]

The ligands oxide and nitride, O2- and N3, occupy even more space than do halide ions and have correspondingly lower effective bond length ratios R(02 [L) 0.6 R(02 /X ) 0.8. [Pg.36]

Figure 21 Bond angles (degrees) for [M(unidentate A)(unidentate B)5], as a function of effective bond length ratio R... Figure 21 Bond angles (degrees) for [M(unidentate A)(unidentate B)5], as a function of effective bond length ratio R...
The form of this potential energy surface is critically dependent on the effective bond length ratio J (unidentate/bidentate). As 7 (unidentate/bidentate) becomes less than unity, stereochemistry C becomes very stable, a typical potential energy surface being shown in Figure 70. Conversely, as /i(unidentate/bidentate) increases, it is the other end of the potential energy trough that deepens,... [Pg.79]

Table 6 Effective Bond Length Ratios for a Non-bonding Pair of Electrons, / (lone pair/X)... Table 6 Effective Bond Length Ratios for a Non-bonding Pair of Electrons, / (lone pair/X)...
The stabilization of the dodecahedron for complexes of the type [M(unidentate A)4(unidentate 6)4] is shown by the potential energy surface in Figure 80, calculated for the effective bond length ratio /J(A/B) = 1.20. Figure 80 is directly comparable to Figure 78a, in which all metal-ligand bonds were equal. Figure 80 clearly shows that the dodecahedron at 0a — — 45" has been stabilized... [Pg.102]


See other pages where Effective bond length ratios is mentioned: [Pg.94]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.602]   


SEARCH



Length, effect

© 2024 chempedia.info