Dry tray efficiency

Dry tray efficiency, fraction Wet tray efficiency, fraction... 

When the dry tray pressure drop is significantly less than the hydraulic tray pressure drop, then the tray will start to leak or weep, and tray efficiency will be adversely affected. 

For a tray to function reasonably close to its best efficiency point, the dry tray pressure drop must be roughly equal ( 50 percent) to the hydraulic tray pressure drop ... 

The dry Murphree efficiency calculated thus far takes into account the vapor and liquid resistances and the vapor-liquid contact patterns, but is uncorrected for the effects of entrainment and weeping. This correction converts the dry efficiency to a "wet or actual Murphree tray efficiency. Colburn [Eq. (14-98), under "Entrainment ] incorporated the effect of entrainment on efficiency, assuming perfect mixing of liquid on the tray. 

Important Note Bubble cap HHD factor is equivalent to the DPntAYi dry pressure drop of valve trays. The bubble cap tray total pressure drop factor DPTRay is equivalent to the HDC2 factor of valve-type trays. You may therefore substitute these bubble cap values in the ETF efficiency equations as given for valve trays to determine bubble cap tray efficiency. 

Through-ckculation compartments employ perforated or screen bottom trays and suitable flow baffles so gas is forced through the material. If material is not inherently pervious to gas flow, it may be mechanically shaped iato noodles, pellets, or briquettes. These dryers are used ia small-scale operations to dry explosives, foods, and pigments. Dryer efficiency is 50—70%. Based on tray area, water vaporization rates are 1—10 kg/(h-m ). 

The tray temperatures in our preflash tower, shown in Fig. 4.4, drop as the gas flows up the tower. Most of the reduced sensible-heat content of the flowing gas is converted to latent heat of evaporation of the downflowing reflux. This means that the liquid flow, or internal reflux rate, decreases as the liquid flows down the column. The greater the temperature drop per tray, the greater the evaporation of internal reflux. It is not unusual for 80 to 90 percent of the reflux to evaporate between the top and bottom trays in the absorption section of many towers. We say that the lower trays, in the absorption section of such a tower, are drying out. The separation efficiency of trays operating with extremely low liquid flows over their weirs will be very low. This problem is commonly encountered for towers with low reflux ratios, and a multicomponent overhead product composition. 

---