Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dropping charging current

Mesh strainers finer than 100 mesh/inch (<150 /rm) should be treated as microfilters. Coarser strainers up to 50 mesh/inch (300 /rm) may generate significant static when fouled with accumulated debris, so should be treated as microfilters except in cases where fouling is not expected or may be rapidly identified by either periodic inspection or monitored pressure drop. Clean strainers should nevertheless be placed as far upstream as practical for nonconductive liquid service. A theoretical model for the charging process in strainers (screens) is given in [119-120]. Viscous nonconductive liquids (5-2.5.4) may produce unusually high charging currents in strainers. [Pg.118]

Hence, the charging current decreases during the drop life, while the diffusion current increases (Figure 3-3) ... [Pg.66]

The difference between the various pulse voltammetric techniques is the excitation waveform and the current sampling regime. With both normal-pulse and differential-pulse voltammetry, one potential pulse is applied for each drop of mercury when the DME is used. (Both techniques can also be used at solid electrodes.) By controlling the drop time (with a mechanical knocker), the pulse is synchronized with the maximum growth of the mercury drop. At this point, near the end of the drop lifetime, the faradaic current reaches its maximum value, while the contribution of the charging current is minimal (based on the time dependence of the components). [Pg.67]

Normal-pulse voltammetry consists of a series of pulses of increasing amplitude applied to successive drops at a preselected time near the end of each drop lifetime (4). Such a normal-pulse train is shown in Figure 3-4. Between the pidses, the electrode is kept at a constant (base) potential at which no reaction of the analyte occurs. The amplitude of the pulse increases linearly with each drop. The current is measured about 40 ms after the pulse is applied, at which time the contribution of the charging current is nearly zero. In addition, because of the short pulse duration, the diffusion layer is thinner than that in DC polarography (i.e., there is larger flux of... [Pg.67]

A version of the galvanostatic method is that where the current is turned off (or a current f = 0 is applied ) and the polarization decay curve is measured. Consider an electrode which up to the time t = 0, when the current was turned off, had the potentiaf F at the net current density When the current is turned off, the ohmic voftage drop in the electrolyte gap between the electrode and the tip of the Luggin capillary vanishes, so that the potential instantaneously shifts to the value F (Fig. 12.11). After that the electrode potential returns (falls) relatively slowly to its open-circuit value, for which a certain nonfaradaic charging current is required. Since ip + =... [Pg.206]

Now we can write the equation for the charging current, ic, during the growth of the drop as... [Pg.140]

Fig. 3.19. Diffusion current iF and charging current ic during Hg drop growth. Fig. 3.19. Diffusion current iF and charging current ic during Hg drop growth.
A charging current (non-faradaic) due to the formation of an electric double layer on the surface of the growing drop most polarographs permit a... [Pg.145]

The Cyclic Voltammetry Experiment. Faradaic and Double-Layer Charging Currents. Ohmic Drop... [Pg.10]

Convolution may also be applied to ohmic drop correction in the case where a substantial double-layer charging current is present, unlike the preceding case. It suffices first to extract the Faradaic current from the total current according to equation (1.19) [obtained from equations (1.11)]... [Pg.24]

Double-layer charging current and ohmic drop are likely to interfere at high scan rates. The procedures for extracting the Faradaic component of the current and correcting the potential axis from the effect of ohmic drop described earlier (see Sections 1.3.2 and 1.4.3) should then be applied. The same is true for the double-layer effect on the electron transfer kinetics (Section 1.4.2). [Pg.90]

DME, measured as drop time- or surface tension-potential curve, and a simplified model of the double layer, (b) Charging current-potential curve. [Pg.124]

The recorded current is caused not only by the heterogeneous electron transfer to the substrate (the Faradaic current ), but also by the current used to charge the electrical double layer, which acts as a capacitor. The measured potentials include the potential drop caused by the ohmic resistance in the solution, the iR drop. Both the charging current ic and the iR drop grows with the sweep rate it is always desirable to compensate for ic and iR drop, but it becomes imperative at higher sweep rates. There exist different ways to compensate electrically for these phenomena, and this makes it possible to operate up to about 103 V sec-1. It is assumed below that the data are obtained with proper compensation. [Pg.239]


See other pages where Dropping charging current is mentioned: [Pg.1939]    [Pg.1940]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.786]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.369]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.381 ]




SEARCH



Charge charging current

Charge current

Current charged

Drop, charged

© 2024 chempedia.info