Dispersion self-energy

In the non-retarded limit i.e. ignoring the finite velocity of light, the dispersion self-energy computed with this form factor can be shown to be [11, 12] ... 

The dispersion self-energy is of the same order of magnitude as the binding energy for a hydrogen atom, but of opposite sign. 

Phenomenological quasiparticle model. Taking into account only the dominant contributions in (7), namely the quasiparticle contributions of the transverse gluons as well as the quark particle-excitations for Nj / 0, we arrive at the quasiparticle model [8], The dispersion relations can be even further simplified by their form at hard momenta, u2 h2 -rnf, where m.t gT are the asymptotic masses. With this approximation of the self-energies, the pressure reads in analogy to the scalar case... 

One finds that u = —Wonn / A%D ). The interaction energy per unit area between two membranes of thickness, 2, separated by a distance, 2D is proportional to d /D when d D and is attractive. For small separations relative to the membrane thickness, D d, the interaction decays as l/D. In this case, the interaction decays with the same power law as in the case of two semi-infinite media separated by a gap of distance D, since when d D, the membranes appear to be infinitely thick compared to the gap size. Another important quantity is the self energy of a slab of thickness D. For this calculation, a cutoff on the short distance part of the energy is needed, so one can write the dispersion interaction as [r -t- where... 

Nor is the methodology exhaustive in terms of experimental data, as required of a proper alloy theory. Indeed, it produces results that are known to be contrary to the behavior of physical systems. For example, it yield a self-energy that is real whereas the dispersion in the experimental spectra of disordered alloys suggests a complex quantity. Because the method lacks scientific foundation, its generalization to incorporate a broader spectrum of physical reality is unjustified. 

The Self-Consistent Reaction Field (SCRF) model considers the solvent as a uniform polarizable medium with a dielectric constant of s, with the solute M placed in a suitable shaped hole in the medium. Creation of a cavity in the medium costs energy, i.e. this is a destabilization, while dispersion interactions between the solvent and solute add a stabilization (this is roughly the van der Waals energy between solvent and solute). The electric charge distribution of M will furthermore polarize the medium (induce charge moments), which in turn acts back on the molecule, thereby producing an electrostatic stabilization. The solvation (free) energy may thus be written as... 

When the silver nanocrystals are organized in a 2D superlattice, the plasmon peak is shifted toward an energy lower than that obtained in solution (Fig. 6). The covered support is washed with hexane, and the nanoparticles are dispersed again in the solvent. The absorption spectrum of the latter solution is similar to that used to cover the support (free particles in hexane). This clearly indicates that the shift in the absorption spectrum of nanosized silver particles is due to their self-organization on the support. The bandwidth of the plasmon peak (1.3 eV) obtained after deposition is larger than that in solution (0.9 eV). This can be attributed to a change in the dielectric constant of the composite medium. Similar behavior is observed for various nanocrystal sizes (from 3 to 8 nm). 

---