Direct methods substructure phasing

The Patterson synthesis (Patterson, 1935), or Patterson map as it is more commonly known, will be discussed in detail in the next chapter. It is important in conjunction with all of the methods above, except perhaps direct methods, but in theory it also offers a means of deducing a molecular structure directly from the intensity data alone. In practice, however, Patterson techniques can be used to solve an entire structure only if the structure contains very few atoms, three or four at most, though sometimes more, up to a dozen or so if the atoms are arranged in a unique motif such as a planar ring structure. Direct deconvolution of the Patterson map to solve even a very small macromolecule is impossible, and it provides no useful approach. Substructures within macromolecular crystals, such as heavy atom constellations (in isomorphous replacement) or constellations of anomalous scattered, however, are amenable to direct Patterson interpretation. These substructures may then be used to solve the phase problem by one of the other techniques described below. 

Patterson synthesis by itself cannot solve even moderately large molecular structures (five or six equally heavy atoms) unless concrete structure information already exists so that the vector space can be systematically searched for a presumed structure or substructure. A search of this kind might be done with a computer, perhaps by the method of pattern-seeking functions, or the convolution molecule method [57]. [75]. These techniques, however, are not so often used today, having been supplanted by direct phase-determination methods (Section 15.2.2.2), which make it possible to reach the goal quickly on the basis of relatively little prior knowledge [76], Patterson synthesis may return to prominence when used to identify sets of starting phases (Section 15.2.2.2). 

---