Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusivity prefactor

Repeat the above steps at different waiting times, sample temperatures, and initial adsorbate coverages to obtain the diffusion activation energy, diffusion prefactor, and effects of adsorbate-adsorbate interactions. [Pg.635]

Grain boundary self-diffusion prefactor times the grain boundary thickness 5, m /s... [Pg.225]

Did Grain boundary self-diffusion prefactor times the grain boundary thickness 5, m /s (5.3 1.4)-10 (Perkins et al. [95])... [Pg.233]

Note in passing that the common model in the theory of diffusion of impurities in 3D Debye crystals is the so-called deformational potential approximation with C a>)ccco,p co)ccco and J o ) oc co, which, for a strictly symmetric potential, displays weakly damped oscillations and does not have a well defined rate constant. If the system permits definition of the rate constant at T = 0, the latter is proportional to the square of the tunneling matrix element times the Franck-Condon factor, whereas accurate determination of the prefactor requires specifying the particular spectrum of the bath. [Pg.24]

Here the nucleation barrier AO is the excess thermodynamic potential needed to form the critical embryo within the uniform metastable state, while the prefactor Jq is determined by the kinetic characteristics for the embryo diffusion in the space of its size a. Expressions for both AO and Jo given by Zeldovich include a number of phenomenological parameters. [Pg.111]

The diffusion coefficients of this system were determined for disordered micelles and bcc spheres [47]. They were found to be retarded as compared to the disordered state. This retardation is consistent with a hindered diffusion process, D Do exp(- AxN ), with D0 being the diffusion coefficient in the absence of any interactions (i.e. for y -> 0), and A is a prefactor of order unity. Hence, the diffusion barrier increases with the enthalpic penalty xNa, where N represents the number of monomers in the foreign block. In the simplest description of hindered diffusion, the prefactor A remains constant. This model describes the experimental data poorly as A was found to increase with xNa [47]. [Pg.151]

Early-time motion, for segments s such that UgM(s)activated exploration of the original tube by the free end. In the absence of topological constraints along the contour, the end monomer moves by the classical non-Fickian diffusion of a Rouse chain, with spatial displacement f, but confined to the single dimension of the chain contour variable s. We therefore expect the early-time result for r(s) to scale as s. When all prefactors are calculated from the Rouse model [2] for Gaussian chains with local friction we find the form... [Pg.219]

Here Tq is — C2 and is a prefactor proportional to which is determined by the transport coefficient (in this case at the given reference temperature. The constant B has the dimensions of energy but is not related to any simple activation process (Ratner, 1987). Eqn (6.6) holds for many transport properties and, by making the assumption of a fully dissociated electrolyte, it can be related to the diffusion coefficient through the Stokes-Einstein equation giving the form to which the conductivity, <7, in polymer electrolytes is often fitted,... [Pg.132]

Thus, the pressure difference on the two sides of the step is proportional to the difference of the inverse cubes of the terrace widths (neglecting possible intereactions with more distant steps). Again in the overdamped limit, the step velocity f)x/<5t is proportional to the pressure from the terrace behind the step minus the pressure from the terrace ahead of the step. Since the motion is again step diffusion, the prefactor ought to contain the same transport coefficient as that for equilibrium fluctuations, fa for EC or Ds Cs , for TD, in either case divided by keT. Alternatively, this can be described as a current produced by the gradient of achemicalpotential associated witheachstep(Rettori and Villain, 1988). [Pg.87]


See other pages where Diffusivity prefactor is mentioned: [Pg.455]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.899]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.16]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.274 ]




SEARCH



Prefactor

© 2024 chempedia.info