Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion effects, electron-transfer structure

Theoretical models available in the literature consider the electron loss, the counter-ion diffusion, or the nucleation process as the rate-limiting steps they follow traditional electrochemical models and avoid any structural treatment of the electrode. Our approach relies on the electro-chemically stimulated conformational relaxation control of the process. Although these conformational movements179 are present at any moment of the oxidation process (as proved by the experimental determination of the volume change or the continuous movements of artificial muscles), in order to be able to quantify them, we need to isolate them from either the electrons transfers, the counter-ion diffusion, or the solvent interchange we need electrochemical experiments in which the kinetics are under conformational relaxation control. Once the electrochemistry of these structural effects is quantified, we can again include the other components of the electrochemical reaction to obtain a complete description of electrochemical oxidation. [Pg.374]

A large number of these values are close to the diffusion limit. This is not actually very surprising since the coupling of the aryl radical with the nucleophile has to compete with quite rapid side-reactions, if only its electron-transfer reduction, for the substitution to be effective. When taking place homogeneously, the latter reaction itself at the diffusion limit and the parameter that governs the competition is Anu[Nu ]/Ad[RX]. This is the reason why a discussion of structure-reactivity relationships is necessarily restricted to a rather narrow experimental basis. [Pg.92]

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) of VO-porphyrins on reduced and sulfided catalysts exhibit shifts in the porphyrinic electronic spectra (Soret, a, (3 bands) to higher frequencies. Adsorption results in modification of the delocalized electronic resonance structure not observed on the oxide form of the catalyst. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals shifts to higher Mo binding energies on reduced and sulfided catalysts following VO-porphyrin adsorption, consistent with transfer of electrons from Mo electron donor sites to the V02+ ion. Interaction at the electron donor sites is stronger than interaction at electron acceptor sites typical of the oxide catalyst. This gives rise to the possibility of lower VO-porphyrin diffusion rates on sulfided catalysts, but this effect has not been experimentally demonstrated. [Pg.206]

A second set of possibilities arises if the electroactive species is adsorbed onto the surface of the micelle under these circumstances the main effects will be a marked decrease (normally) in apparent diffusion coefficient and again the possibility of inhibited electron transfer due to surface aggregate formation. Finally, the micelle itself may be formed from electroactive surfactant species, and their electrochemistry under controlled hydrodynamic conditions used to explore changes in structure with increasing surfactant or background electrolyte concentrations. [Pg.427]

Since all of the CdS clusters reside in the sodalite cages of the zeolite Y framework, the larger supercages of the structure are still available for absorption of substrate molecules - in this case olefins for photo- oxidation via electron transfer. Colloidal CdS in free solution has been used for such oxidations previously(19) and in a competitive oxidation of styrene and 1,1-diphenylethylene we find that unconfined bulk CdS will effect oxidation in a ratio of 1 2 for these two olefins (irradiation at 365nm). In the zeolite confined system we find however that the ratio becomes 1 1 ie a slight shift in selectivity toward the smaller substrate as may be expected on the basis of size/diffusion effects. From the viewpoint of the enzyme mimic, we have here a system... [Pg.151]

Cryochemically synthesized PPX films containing metal or semiconductor nanocrystals have a fine porous structure caused by features of solid-state polymerization. Due to this structure, molecules of gaseous substances readily penetrate into polymer film from the environment. Synthesized composite films demonstrate valuable strong sensor effects resulting from a marked influence of some low-molecular-weight molecules, diffusing into the polymer and adsorbed onto nanocrystals, on the film conductivity [4, 30, 62-64]. Such effects are characteristic of films whose conductivity is governed by electron transfer between nanoparticles. [Pg.59]


See other pages where Diffusion effects, electron-transfer structure is mentioned: [Pg.430]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.1200]    [Pg.2234]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.913]    [Pg.2980]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.1199]    [Pg.2233]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.134]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.594 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion effective

Diffusion effects diffusivity

Diffusion effects, electron-transfer

Diffusive transfer

Effective diffusivities

Effective diffusivity

Electron diffusion

Electron transfer effect

Structural diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info