Diagonal ordering

First, we note that the site-diagonal order parameter... 

If the Saupe ordering matrix is written in terms of the laboratory axis frame, but assuming now that the molecules are uniaxial, then phase biaxiality can be described in terms of the order parameter P, which is nonzero for tilted smectic phases and other intrinsically biaxial phases. For example the diagonal ordering matrix for the molecular long axis z can be written as ... 

Instead, when the diagonal order of blocks SI and Cl is to be taken into account the next SuT indices may be constructed ... 

Let u be a vector valued stochastic variable with dimension D x 1 and with covariance matrix Ru of size D x D. The key idea is to linearly transform all observation vectors, u , to new variables, z = W Uy, and then solve the optimization problem (1) where we replace u, by z . We choose the transformation so that the covariance matrix of z is diagonal and (more importantly) none if its eigenvalues are too close to zero. (Loosely speaking, the eigenvalues close to zero are those that are responsible for the large variance of the OLS-solution). In order to liiid the desired transformation, a singular value decomposition of /f is performed yielding... 

Note that h is simply the diagonal matrix of zeroth-order eigenvalues In the following, it will be assumed that the zeroth-order eigenfunction a reasonably good approximation to the exact ground-state wavefiinction (meaning that Xfi , and h and v will be written in the compact representations... 

The off-diagonal elements in this representation of h and v are the zero vector of lengtii (for h) and matrix elements which couple the zeroth-order ground-state eigenfunction members of the set q (for v) ... 

However, if the zeroth-order ground-state energy is well separated from low lying excited states, the diagonal... 

If only zero-order states from the same polyad are conpled together, this constitutes a fantastic simplification in the Flamiltonian. Enonnons compntational economies result in fitting spectra, becanse the spectroscopic Flamiltonian is block diagonal in the polyad nnmber. That is, only zero-order states within blocks with the same polyad number are coupled the resulting small matrix diagonalization problem is vastly simpler than diagonalizing a matrix with all the zero-order states conpled to each other. 

We now consider the connection between the preceding equations and the theory of Aharonov et al. [18] [see Eqs. (51)-(60)]. The tempting similarity between the structures of Eqs. (56) and (90), hides a fundamental difference in the roles of the vector operator A in Eq. (56) and the vector potential a in Eq. (90). The fomrer is defined, in the adiabatic partitioning scheme, as a stiictly off-diagonal operator, with elements (m A n) = (m P n), thereby ensuring that (P — A) is diagonal. By contiast, the Mead-Truhlar vector potential a arises from the influence of nonzero diagonal elements, (n P /i) on the nuclear equation for v), an aspect of the problem not addressed by Arahonov et al. [18]. Suppose, however, that Eq. (56) was contracted between (n and n) v) in order to handle the adiabatic nuclear dynamics within the Aharonov scheme. The result becomes... 

Some final comments on the relevance of non-adiabatic coupling matrix elements to the nature of the vector potential a are in order. The above analysis of the implications of the Aharonov coupling scheme for the single-surface nuclear dynamics shows that the off-diagonal operator A provides nonzero contiibutions only via the term (n A n). There are therefore no necessary contributions to a from the non-adiabatic coupling. However, as discussed earlier, in Section IV [see Eqs. (34)-(36)] in the context of the x e Jahn-Teller model, the phase choice t / = —4>/2 coupled with the identity... 

The method shown affords easy generalization to higher order coupling in the important case where a single mode is engaged, that is, G i = g i = (l/i /2) e . Then the two off-diagonal terms derived above are, after physics-based constant coefficients have been affixed, in the upper right comer... 

For states of different symmetry, to first order the terms AW and W[2 are independent. When they both go to zero, there is a conical intersection. To connect this to Section III.C, take Qq to be at the conical intersection. The gradient difference vector in Eq. f75) is then a linear combination of the symmetric modes, while the non-adiabatic coupling vector inEq. (76) is a linear combination of the appropriate nonsymmetric modes. States of the same symmetry may also foiiti a conical intersection. In this case it is, however, not possible to say a priori which modes are responsible for the coupling. All totally symmetric modes may couple on- or off-diagonal, and the magnitudes of the coupling determine the topology. 

Thus in the lowest order approximation the angle x is eliminated from the off-diagonal matrix elements of [second and third of Eqs. (60)] it solely determines the selection rules for matrix elements of Hg with respect to nuclear basis functions. 

The zeroth-order Hamiltonian and the spin-orbit part of the perturbation are diagonal with respect to the quantum numbers K, E, P, Uj, It, Uc, and Ic-The terms of H involving the parameters aj, ac, and bo aie diagonal with respect to both the Ij and Ic quantum numbers, while the f>2 term connects with one another the basis functions with I j = Ij 2, 4- 2. The c terms... 

---