Property relationships dependent

Three time-dependent property relationships have thus far been derived for a gelation system. These are for viscosity, light scattering, and refractive index. It should be noted that these relationships have been derived to the gel point. Past gelation, other processes related to the aging, or postgelation reactions, occur that are not treated by these formalisms. The three relationships are summarized in Table 1. 

Obviously, to model these effects simultaneously becomes a very complex task. Hence, most calculation methods treat the effects which are not directly related to the molecular structure as constant. As an important consequence, prediction models are valid only for the system under investigation. A model for the prediction of the acidity constant pfQ in aqueous solutions cannot be applied to the prediction of pKj values in DMSO solutions. Nevertheless, relationships between different systems might also be quantified. Here, Kamlet s concept of solvatochro-mism, which allows the prediction of solvent-dependent properties with respect to both solute and solvent [1], comes to mind. 

To illustrate the effect of radial release interactions on the structure/ property relationships in shock-loaded materials, experiments were conducted on copper shock loaded using several shock-recovery designs that yielded differences in es but all having been subjected to a 10 GPa, 1 fis pulse duration, shock process [13]. Compression specimens were sectioned from these soft recovery samples to measure the reload yield behavior, and examined in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) to study the substructure evolution. The substructure and yield strength of the bulk shock-loaded copper samples were found to depend on the amount of e, in the shock-recovered sample at a constant peak pressure and pulse duration. In Fig. 6.8 the quasi-static reload yield strength of the 10 GPa shock-loaded copper is observed to increase with increasing residual sample strain. 

Flow behavior of the polymer blends is determined by their structure, which is governed by the degree of dispersion of the component and by the mode of their distribution. For blends having identical compositions, it is possible to produce systems in which one and the same component may be either a dispersion medium or a dispersed phase [1]. This behavior of the polyblend systems depends on various parameters, the most important of which is the blending sequence. It is, therefore, difficult to obtain a uniform composition property relationship for the polymer blends even though the composition remains identical. 

The structure-property relationship of graft copolymers based on an elastomeric backbone poly(ethyl acry-late)-g-polystyrene was studied by Peiffer and Rabeony [321. The copolymer was prepared by the free radical polymerization technique and, it was found that the improvement in properties depends upon factors such as the number of grafts/chain, graft molecular weight, etc. It was shown that mutually grafted copolymers produce a variety of compatibilized ternary component blends. 

It is now opportune to consider the structure-property relationships of fluorochemical finishes in more detail [501,502]. Water repellency depends mainly on reducing the critical surface energy of the fabric surface. This parameter must be less than that of the wetting... 

In the second half of the nineteenth century the structural theory of organic chemistry was developed. It led to the concept that chemical, physical and biological properties of all kinds must vary with structural change. The earliest structure-property relationships (SPR) were qualitative. With the development of methods of quantitative measurement of these properties data accumulated. Attempts were then made to develop quantitative models of the structural dependence of these properties. These methods for the quantitative description of structural effects will now be described. 

Quantitative structure-physical property relationships (QSPR). There are two types of physical properties we must consider ground state properties and properties which depend on the difference in energy between the ground state and an excited state. Examples of the former are bond lengths, bond angles and dipole moments. The latter include infrared, ultraviolet, nuclear magnetic resonance and other types of spectra, ionization potentials and electron affinities. 

Nearly all structure/properties relationships that were discussed for homopolymers are also valid for copolymers. Additional dependencies exist as a result of the composition and structure of the different types of copolymers. 

The relationships between structures and properties can be classified as intrinsic and extrinsic owing to the molecular arrangement and morphology, respectively. The term intrinsic refers to the 3D packing of molecules, which depends on the geometry and chemical nature of the molecules, and thus on intermolecular interactions. Extrinsic structure-property relationships are related to the formation of interfaces, e.g., grain boundaries, and the presence of defects. In both cases the role of external variables such as T, P, B as well as of internal variables such as the type of guest molecules is essential. 

---