Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density factor

The X-ray instrumentation requires a commercial small angle X-ray camera, a standard fine structure X-ray generator and a sample manipulator if scanning is requested. The essential signal is the relative difference between the refraction level Ir and the absorption level Ia. Both levels are measured simultaneously by two scintillation detectors. At fixed angles of deflection this signal depends solely on the inner surface density factor C and thickness d of the sample [2] ... [Pg.558]

Density Factor A factor used to correct the density of standard air or other gases for altitude, temperature, or moisture content. [Pg.1428]

Effect of Material and Load The sieving constant, C, increases geometrically with load. In addition there is a shape factor, a roughness factor, and a density factor such that ... [Pg.500]

The maximum heat flux for stable nucleate boiling will, however, be less for a tube bundle than for a single tube. Palen and Small (1964) suggest modifying the Zuber equation for single tubes (equation 12.64) with a tube density factor. This approach was supported by Palen et al. (1972). [Pg.751]

The final ingredient that enters the calculation is the density factor pw. This is the actual density of water appropriate to the thermodynamic state intended in the calculation. For the usual case of 1 atm. pressure and 298K, this is I gem 3. The reference density in the electronic structure calculations is p° = 1 atm//entropic cost of sequestering water in the metal-water complexes, the free energies should be adjusted by —mRT In (pi 2o/p ) = —mRTIn (1354). With these inputs the excess chemical potential is readily composed as per (9.50), provided the optimal value of m is known. This is found by composing the excess chemical potential for different assumed m values and identifying the most stable case. For the dication transition metals studied, this is found to be six, consistent with experiment [12]. [Pg.340]

Figure 6. Pressure drop per unit length versus deaeration and particle density factor (Mainwaring and Reed, 1987). Figure 6. Pressure drop per unit length versus deaeration and particle density factor (Mainwaring and Reed, 1987).
N Is the number of molecules per unit volume (packing density factor), fv Is a Lorentz local field correction at frequency v(fv= [(nv)2 + 2]/3, v = u) or 2u). Although generally admitted, this type of local field correction Is an approximation vdilch certainly deserves further Investigation. IJK (resp Ijk) are axis denominations of the crystalline (resp. molecular) reference frames, n(g) Is the number of equivalent positions In the unit cell for the crystal point symmetry group g bjjj, crystalline nonlinearity per molecule, has been recently Introduced 0.4) to get general expressions, lndependant of the actual number of molecules within the unit cell (possibly a (sub) multiple of n(g)). [Pg.83]

As before, the summation over n is replaced by integration over the energy spectrum and introduction of the density factor p(E). Thus, finally... [Pg.491]

Figure 4.10(b) shows the temperature dependence of the absorption spectrum expected for an indirect gap. It can be noted that the contribution due to becomes less important with decreasing temperature. This is due to the temperature dependence of the phonon density factor (see Equation (4.37)). Indeed, at 0 K there are no phonons to be absorbed and only one straight line, related to a phonon emission process, is observed. From Figure 4.10(b) we can also infer that cog shifts to higher values as the temperature decreases, which reflects the temperature dependence of the energy... [Pg.137]

Select the method of calculation for tray efficiency. Two methods are presented the O Connell method and the two-film method. In the programs accompanying this book, you may select the O Connell method by entering either an F for fractionator or an A for absorbers. In 1946, O Connell [4] published curves on log-log plots showing both absorber and fractionator efficiencies vs. equilibrium-viscosity-density factored equations. Separate curves for absorbers and fractionators were given. Such data have been curve-fit using a modified least-squares method in conjunction with a log scale setup. The fit is found to be reasonably close to the O Connell published curves. [Pg.90]

The hL factor is an unknown variable to be calculated it is the pressure loss due to the friction in the pipe. It may be expressed as feet of fluid or pounds per square inch (psi). If expressed as psi, the following equation is used, factoring the density factor p ... [Pg.221]

A detailed account of the reasons for the different behavior of particles in air and water is given later in this chapter. The equations thus far developed are general and apply to all fluids. There are real differences between fluids which can generally be attributed to the density factor (p — po)/po-... [Pg.406]

The size factor is approximated by the product of the third power of the near maximum particle size a shape (or form) factor /, and a particle size distribution (granulometric) factor g. The density factor is approximated by the product of a composition factor c and a liberation factor 1. A summary of common or calculated values for these parameters is given in Table B.l (Pitard,... [Pg.90]

Fig. 1.—Density factors at a crystal- amorphous boundary with through-going chains. Z) > 1 directional randomization for anisotropy, D 2. A > avoidance say, A. 5. B> backtracking B N (what is N ). Product BAD 3. Fig. 1.—Density factors at a crystal- amorphous boundary with through-going chains. Z) > 1 directional randomization for anisotropy, D 2. A > avoidance say, A. 5. B> backtracking B N (what is N ). Product BAD 3.
If we make the simplifying assumption that the density factor in (27-6) is unity, and if (for broad applicability) we consider the relative-percent difference in composition of the two kinds of particles, lOOfP — P jPt, we can calculate the curves... [Pg.572]

Pitard (4) presents two formulas relating an estimate of the Var(FE) to the weight of the sample and the panicle size. One case is fairly general the other is for panicle size distribution. In each case, physical characteristics of the panicles are used a size factor and a density factor. By characterizing the type of material being sampled, we can determine if our sample weight is sufficient to get a desired low variance of the estimate, and if not, what we can to do reduce that variance. Because the characterizations are made on a preliminary examination of the material, these formulas are an order of approximation only. [Pg.18]


See other pages where Density factor is mentioned: [Pg.1789]    [Pg.1789]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.1549]    [Pg.1549]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.350]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 , Pg.64 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info