Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Delta function convolution with

There has been a considerable decline in the number of papers which deal with the details of techniques of measurement of fluorescence decay. This is no doubt due to the fact that the alternative methods are now essentially well established. Nevertheless a microcomputerized ultrahigh speed transient digitizer and luminescence lifeline instrument has been described . A very useful multiplexed array fluorometer allows simultaneous fluorescence decay at different emission wavelength using single photon timing array detection . Data collection rates could approach that for a repetitive laser pulse system and the technique could be usefully applied to HPLC or microscopy. The power of this equipment has been exemplified by studies on aminotetraphenylporphyrins at emission wavelengths up to 680 nm. The use and performance of the delta function convolution method for the estimation of fluorescence decay parameters has been... [Pg.7]

For instance, inaccurate positions of spherical hard-domains in their lattice of colloidal dimensions 2SIn real space there is a convolution of the ideal atom s position (a delta-function) with the real probability distribution to find it. [Pg.124]

Fig. 8. Generation of the form of the helical diffraction pattern. (A) shows that a continuous helical wire can be considered as a convolution of one turn of the helix and a set of points (actually three-dimensional delta-functions) aligned along the helix axis and separated axially by the pitch P. (B) shows that a discontinuous helix (i.e., a helical array of subunits) can be thought of as a product of the continuous helix in (A) and a set of horizontal density planes spaced h apart, where h is the subunit axial translation as in Fig. 7. This discontinuous set of points can then be convoluted with an atom (or a more complicated motif) to give a helical polymer. (C)-(F) represent helical objects and their computed diffraction patterns. (C) is half a turn of a helical wire. Its transform is a cross of intensity (high intensity is shown as white). (D) A full turn gives a similar cross with some substructure. A continuous helical wire has the transform of a complete helical turn, multiplied by the transform of the array of points in the middle of (A), namely, a set of planes of intensity a distance n/P apart (see Fig. 7). This means that in the transform in (E) the helix cross in (D) is only seen on the intensity planes, which are n/P apart. (F) shows the effect of making the helix in (E) discontinuous. The broken helix cross in (E) is now convoluted with the transform of the set of planes in (B), which are h apart. This transform is a set of points along the meridian of the diffraction pattern and separated by m/h. The resulting transform in (F) is therefore a series of helix crosses as in (E) but placed with their centers at the positions m/h from the pattern center. (Transforms calculated using MusLabel or FIELIX.)... Fig. 8. Generation of the form of the helical diffraction pattern. (A) shows that a continuous helical wire can be considered as a convolution of one turn of the helix and a set of points (actually three-dimensional delta-functions) aligned along the helix axis and separated axially by the pitch P. (B) shows that a discontinuous helix (i.e., a helical array of subunits) can be thought of as a product of the continuous helix in (A) and a set of horizontal density planes spaced h apart, where h is the subunit axial translation as in Fig. 7. This discontinuous set of points can then be convoluted with an atom (or a more complicated motif) to give a helical polymer. (C)-(F) represent helical objects and their computed diffraction patterns. (C) is half a turn of a helical wire. Its transform is a cross of intensity (high intensity is shown as white). (D) A full turn gives a similar cross with some substructure. A continuous helical wire has the transform of a complete helical turn, multiplied by the transform of the array of points in the middle of (A), namely, a set of planes of intensity a distance n/P apart (see Fig. 7). This means that in the transform in (E) the helix cross in (D) is only seen on the intensity planes, which are n/P apart. (F) shows the effect of making the helix in (E) discontinuous. The broken helix cross in (E) is now convoluted with the transform of the set of planes in (B), which are h apart. This transform is a set of points along the meridian of the diffraction pattern and separated by m/h. The resulting transform in (F) is therefore a series of helix crosses as in (E) but placed with their centers at the positions m/h from the pattern center. (Transforms calculated using MusLabel or FIELIX.)...
The theoretical analysis here in the present section clearly indicates that the localized delta function excitation in the physical space is supported by the essential singularity (a —> oo) in the image plane. This is made possible because 4> y, a) does not satisfy the condition required for the satisfaction of Jordan s lemma. As any arbitrary function can be shown as a convolution of delta functions with the function depicting the input to the dynamical system. The present analysis indicates that any arbitrary disturbances can be expressed in terms of a few discrete eigenvalues and the essential singularity. In any flow, in addition to these singularities there can be contributions from continuous spectra and branch points - if these are present. [Pg.89]

The determination of crystal structure is then immediate, in principle, since any standard diffraction pattern will be related to, e.g., the product of an appropriate combination of three such delta functions (periodic in x,y,z directions), with atomic form factors. Inversion to get the real space atomic positions from the diffraction pattern is then possible via the convolution theorem for Fourier transforms, provided the purely technical problem of the undetermined phase can be solved. [Pg.81]

However small the structures under study are, the STM tip always consists of atoms, which have a finite dimension. Hence, the structure of the tip has an influence of what is observed with STM. If one assumes in a Gedanken-experiment that an infinitesimally sharp object is standing on the surface (mathematically a delta-function), then the tip will be convoluted at the object (Fig. 10.16, far right) and visible in the STM image will be the front most tip-end (up-side down) and not the sharp object itself. Hence, sharp tips are crucial for high-resolution in STM and, more general, in all Scanning Probe Methods (SPM). [Pg.361]

If the diffusing atom is limited to a small region of space, it is clear that Gs(r, t) tends to a constant shape, G (r, °o) at sufficiently long time. This shape is actually the convolution of the probability distribution of the atom in the confined space convoluted with itself (because the initial point is distributed over the space with the same probability distribution). Clearly, on Fourier transforming in time, this will yield a delta function in (o, i.e. elastic scattering. Thus, on substituting into equation (6.15), we get... [Pg.153]

Convoluting/(jc) with a delta function thus leaves the function/ ) unchanged. Such an operation leaving the operand unmodified is called the identity operation, as is the case when zero is added to a number or a matrix is multiplied with a unit matrix. [Pg.301]

The definition of the convolution product is quite clear like the one of the Fourier transforms, it has a given mathematical expression. An important property of convolution is that the product of two functions corresponds to the Fourier transform of the convolution product of their Fourier transforms. In the context of high-resolution FT-NMR, a typical example is the signal of a given spin coupled to a spin one half. In the time domain, the relaxation gives rise to an exponential decay multiplied by a cosine function under the influence of the coupling. In the frequency domain, the first corresponds to a Lorentzian lineshape while the second corresponds to a doublet of delta functions. The spectrum of such a spin has a lineshape which is the result of the convolution product of the Lorentzian with the doublet of delta functions. In contrast, the word deconvolution is not always used with equal clarity. Sometimes it is meant as the strict reverse process of convolution, in which case it corresponds to a division in the reciprocal domain, but it is often used more loosely to mean simplification. This lack of clarity is due to the diversity of solutions offered to the problem of deconvolution, depending on the function to be deconvoluted, the quality one wishes to obtain, and other parameters. [Pg.158]

The Forman phase correction algorithm, presented in Chap. 2, is shown in Fig. 3.6. Initially, the raw interferogram is cropped around the zero path difference (ZPD) to get a symmetric interferogram called subset. This subset is multiplied by a triangular apodization function and Fourier transformed. With the complex phase obtained from the FFT a convolution Kernel is obtained, which is used to filter the original interferogram and correct the phase. Finally the result of the last operation is Fourier transformed to get the phase corrected spectrum. This process is repeated until the convolution Kernel approximates to a Dirac delta function. [Pg.48]

The first term for <7 = 0 is not interesting (po can be found by other techniques, e.g. by dilatometry). The product term with pi is a result of the convolution theorem and we already have the two Fourier transforms mentioned, namely, the structure factor of unstructured Hquid, that is Lorentzian (5.39a) and the structure factor of a crystal that is delta-functions, Eq. 5.36 ... [Pg.99]

This implies that the sensor response g(t) is obtained from the convolution of the input with the impulse response of the system w(t), because the function L[5 (t)] h the response of the system due to the input of the delta function. Introducing the Fourier transform. [Pg.21]

The mathematical derivation of SPH is based on the calculation of a quantity /using a convolution of/-values with the Dirac delta function S. Subsequently, the Dirac distribution is replaced by a kernel functicMi W, which tends to the delta function in the limit case of its characteristic length, the smoothing length h, becoming zero [11,12]... [Pg.94]

It is a property of Fourier transform mathematics that multiplication in one domain is equivalent to convolution in the other. (Convolution has already been introduced with regard to apodization in Section 2.3.) If we sample an analog interferogram at constant intervals of retardation, we have in effect multiplied the interferogram by a repetitive impulse function. The repetitive impulse function is in actuality an infinite series of Dirac delta functions spaced at an interval 1 jx. That is,... [Pg.60]

The following relation is called the shift theorem for convolution with the delta function. [Pg.353]


See other pages where Delta function convolution with is mentioned: [Pg.169]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.1766]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.240]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.301 ]




SEARCH



Delta

Delta function

© 2024 chempedia.info