Degrees of freedom references

The appropriate value of t (which is found in the statistical tables) depends both on (n - 1), which is the number of degrees of freedom and the degree of confidence required (the term degrees of freedom refers to the number of independent deviations used in calculating a). The value of 1.96 is the t value for an infinite number of degrees of freedom and the 95% confidence limit. 

To test the significance of each coefficient, we obtain the value of t as the ratio of the regression coefficient to its standard error, and look up this value of t with degrees of freedom equal to those of the residual variance. For ba.tir) for example, t = 0.7685143/0.2709 = 2.837 with 135 degrees of freedom. Reference to Table I in the Appendix shows that this corresponds to a level of significance of between 1% and 0.1%. 

The remarks in the previous paragraph apply, of course, only to the case of electronically adiabatic molecular collisions for which all degrees of freedom refer to the motion of nuclei (i.e. translation, rotation and vibration) if transitions between different electronic states are also involved, then there is no way to avoid dealing with an explicit mixture of a quantum description of some degrees of freedom (electronic) and a classical description of the others.9 The description of such non-adiabatic electronic transitions within the framework of classical S-matrix theory has been discussed at length in the earlier review9 and is not included here. 

A function having three variables, x, y, and z, therefore has two independent variables, and can be said to be divariant, or to have two degrees of freedom. Divariance and two degrees of freedom refer to the fact that we are free to choose the values of two of the variables (perhaps within certain ranges), the third then being fixed by the functional relationship. For example, for the function... 

The degrees of freedom refer to rigid molecules, with both translational (Trans.) and rotational (Rot.) degrees of freedom in a unit cell whose size and shape (Cell) also contribute to the total number of degrees of freedom. 

Hamiltonian, but in practice one often begins with a phenomenological set of equations. The set of macrovariables are chosen to include the order parameter and all otlier slow variables to which it couples. Such slow variables are typically obtained from the consideration of the conservation laws and broken synnnetries of the system. The remaining degrees of freedom are assumed to vary on a much faster timescale and enter the phenomenological description as random themial noise. The resulting coupled nonlinear stochastic differential equations for such a chosen relevant set of macrovariables are collectively referred to as the Langevin field theory description. 

U(qJ is referred to as an adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation (ADT) matrix. Its mathematical sbucture is discussed in detail in Section in.C. If the electronic wave functions in the adiabatic and diabatic representations are chosen to be real, as is normally the case, U(q ) is orthogonal and therefore has n n — l)/2 independent elements (or degrees of freedom). This transformation mabix U(qO can be chosen so as to yield a diabatic electronic basis set with desired properties, which can then be used to derive the diabatic nuclear motion Schrodinger equation. By using Eqs. (27) and (28) and the orthonormality of the diabatic and adiabatic electronic basis sets, we can relate the adiabatic and diabatic nuclear wave functions through the same n-dimensional unitary transformation matrix U(qx) according to... 

The diabatic LHSFs are not allowed to diverge anywhere on the half-sphere of fixed radius p. This boundary condition furnishes the quantum numhers n - and each of which is 2D since the reference Hamiltonian hj has two angular degrees of freedom. The superscripts n(, Q in Eq. (95), with n refering to the union of and indicate that the number of linearly independent solutions of Eqs. (94) is equal to the number of diabatic LHSFs used in the expansions of Eq. (95). 

In effect, this represents the root of a statistical average of the squares. The divisor quantity (n — 1) will be referred to as the degrees of freedom. 

An important question is whether one can rigorously express such an average without referring explicitly to the solvent degrees of freedom. In other words. Is it possible to avoid explicit reference to the solvent in the mathematical description of the molecular system and still obtain rigorously correct properties The answer to this question is yes. A reduced probability distribution P(X) that depends only on the solute configuration can be defined as... 

We briefly repeat now the essential parts of the maximum entropy method for details we refer to the literature [167-169]. We seek to obtain information on the dynamics of the internal degree of freedom of the model from PIMC simulations. The solution of this problem is not... 

---