Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Defects migration

However, most impurities and defects are Jalm-Teller unstable at high-symmetry sites or/and react covalently with the host crystal much more strongly than interstitial copper. The latter is obviously the case for substitutional impurities, but also for interstitials such as O (which sits at a relaxed, puckered bond-centred site in Si), H (which bridges a host atom-host atom bond in many semiconductors) or the self-interstitial (which often fonns more exotic stmctures such as the split-(l lO) configuration). Such point defects migrate by breaking and re-fonning bonds with their host, and phonons play an important role in such processes. [Pg.2888]

The activation volume for diffusion, as measured by the pressure dependence of the diffusivity, is zero to within experimental accuracy [13, 14]. This is unexpected for defect-mediated diffusion, as in such cases, the activation volume for diffusion should consist of the sum of the volume of formation of the defect and the activation volume for the defect migration, and this is usually measurable. [Pg.233]

The parameter A could be interpreted as follows. The ratio rfjD = rD is a distinctive time necessary for a particle s passage over the distance r0. If the production rate is p, tp = 1 /pv0 gives a mean time between two defect births in given volume vq. Thus, the quantity A = rp/rD is a ratio of these two distinctive times demonstrating which of two effects - defect migration or its production - is predominant. [Pg.411]

Figure 10-11. Representative trajectory snapshots showing the nuclear skeleton and the two canonical SOMOs (it hr light grey, it dark grey) at different stages of OH bond dissociation. Top panel isolated G at an OH distance of 1.11 A (a), 1.36 A (b), and 1.62 A (c). Middle panel (i 112O at an OH distance of 1.26 A (d), 1.44 A (e), and 1.62 A (f). Bottom panel G(aq) at an OH distance of 1.21 A (g), 1.59 A (h), and 1.59 A (i) note that the identity of the proton that recombines with N to form 7H-keto guanine in (i) is different from the one that was detached from the 7H-enol tautomer in (g) and that a 11 <() charge defect migrated through water between (h) and (i)... Figure 10-11. Representative trajectory snapshots showing the nuclear skeleton and the two canonical SOMOs (it hr light grey, it dark grey) at different stages of OH bond dissociation. Top panel isolated G at an OH distance of 1.11 A (a), 1.36 A (b), and 1.62 A (c). Middle panel (i 112O at an OH distance of 1.26 A (d), 1.44 A (e), and 1.62 A (f). Bottom panel G(aq) at an OH distance of 1.21 A (g), 1.59 A (h), and 1.59 A (i) note that the identity of the proton that recombines with N to form 7H-keto guanine in (i) is different from the one that was detached from the 7H-enol tautomer in (g) and that a 11 <() charge defect migrated through water between (h) and (i)...
Garner, Gray (66) and their co-workers at Bristol are developing interpretations of catalytic processes with special attention to the defect nature of the catalysts. An intensive study of defect migration and its part in a catalytic process, which may well represent the rate-controlling step in many systems, is needed. [Pg.128]

The dose required for amorphization is a function of the kinetics of simultaneous dynamic recovery processes. The recovery process is accelerated at elevated temperatures and, in many cases, is greatly increased by radiation-enhanced defect migration. These simultaneous recovery processes may be associated with defect recombination or annihilation, epitaxial recrystallization at crystalline-amorphous interfaces (Carter and Nobes 1991), or nucleation and growth recrystallization in the bulk of the amorphous state. For any crystalline solid, there is a critical temperature, above which the rate of amorphization is less than the rate of recovery, thus amorphization cannot occur. However, Tc also depends on the energy and mass of the incident beam, as well as the dose rate. [Pg.346]

As yet, we have concerned ourselves with the static structure of point defects. On the other hand, part of what makes such defects so important is their mobility. In the present section, we undertake an analysis of the various schemes that have been set forth to model the motion of point defects in solids, though only from the perspective of classical physics without consideration of the role of quantum effects. In particular, it is the nature of diffusion that occupies us. However, whereas the plan of section 7.2 was the phenomenology of diffusion, the plan of the present section is to show how a combination of microscopic calculations of the total energy and arguments from statistical mechaiucs may be assembled to construct a general description of the rates of defect migration. [Pg.344]

Sandland et al.(M) evolution of a spin 3/2 system by a spin echo Yamanishi et and Michihiro et al. reported the temperature dependence of Ti used to determine the activation energy of defect migration... [Pg.213]


See other pages where Defects migration is mentioned: [Pg.643]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.1073]    [Pg.1804]    [Pg.1811]    [Pg.4536]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.1439]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.1072]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.143 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.143 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Interstitial defects migration properties

Mechanisms of defect migration

Migration of defects

Point defect: also migration energy

Point defects migration properties

© 2024 chempedia.info