Deductable clause

State to another, can be modeled by the deductive form of the horn clauses. This is a common strategy in artiliciai intelligence, and is formalized by situational calculus (Green, 1969). 

The method that Shavlik developed to carry out the structure generalization is complex, and requires the introduction of an extension to the horn clause deduction scheme to allow the repetitive application of a... 

Limits on the extent of any money available for indemnifiable claims can include an overall negotiated cap on damages available under the indemnification provisions and a deductible or basket that must be satisfied by the buyer before it can assert a claim for indemnity. Once a cap limit has been reached, a buyer cannot make a claim against the seller for even the most egregious TSCA violation. TSCA personnel and environmental lawyers should review the applicable clauses because they will likely be the people involved in making any available TSCA claims, and they need to be mindful of the time and other requirements of making those claims. 

FTA is a backward logic, deduction-type hazard analysis method. In the case of ETA (see Clause 2.0), forward, inductive-based logic has been discussed. Both inductive and deductive types have been illustrated in Fig. V/3.0-1B, with explanations of why they are called forward or backward logic. In hazard analysis, a cause creates accidental events, which results in consequences. They can be looked at from different perspectives also. An inductive method is from specific (event) to general (consequences). On the contrary, in a deductive method, it is from general (event/ consequence) to specific (set of causes). In the case of an inductive method, analysis is carried out from event to consequence in forward direction. In a deductive method, analysis is carried out to find the causes from event in the reverse order. 

As said earlier, the concepts of msg and anti-unification were introduced simultaneously, but independently, by [Plotkin 70, 71] and [Reynolds 70]. The original motivation is accredited to [Popplestone 70], who suggested that since unification is useful in automatic deduction by the resolution method, its dual might prove helpful for induction . The main differences between both works are that Plotkin takes a logic-based approach and considers atomic formulas and clauses, whereas Reynolds is more concerned about an algebraic approach and only considers atomic formulas. But their results and msg algorithms are essentially the same. 

These expenses are not deducted directly from operating income and hence bear a less favourable tax position. Such generalizations, of course, may vary with individual companies and their accounting systems. Economic evaluation should be performed before selecting the type of corrosion preventive measure, because the success or failure of a corrosion prevention program depends on economic feasibility as well as on technical performance. A plant engineer who recommends a preventive treatment to his management should be conversant with economic evaluation and justification (see also Clause 13 Part 1 and NACE Standard RP-02-72,1972). 

---