D orbital shape

Atomic orbitals are plots of in three dimensions. These plots generate the familiar s, p, and d orbital shapes. 

The d orbitals are more complex in shape and arrangement in space. In 1925 Touis de Broglie suggested that electrons behaved like waves. This led to the idea of electron probability clouds. The electron probability cloud for one type of d orbital is very strange -it is like a modified p orbital with a ring around the middle (Figure 3.8). You will not need to know the d-orbital shapes at AS level, but you will for A level when studying the transition elements (see Chapter 24). 

The d and f orbitals have more complex shapes there are five equivalent d orbitals and seven equivalent f orbitals for each principal quantum number, each orbital containing a maximum of 2 electrons with opposed spins. 

The d orbital splitting depends on the oxidation state of a given ion hence twb complex ions with the same shape, ligands and coordination number can differ in colour, for example... 

What do orbitals look like There are four different kinds of orbitals, denoted s, p, d, and f] each with a different shape. Of the four, we ll be concerned primarily with s and p orbitals because these are the most common in organic and biological chemistry. The s orbitals are spherical, with the nucleus at their center p orbitals are dumbbell-shaped and four of the five d orbitals are doverleaf-shaped, as shown in Figure 1.3. The fifth d orbital is shaped like an elongated dumbbell with a doughnut around its middle. 

Figure 1.3 Representations of s, p, and d orbitals. The s orbitals are spherical, the p orbitals are dumbbell-shaped, and four of the five d orbitals are cloverleafshaped. Different lobes of p orbitals are often drawn for convenience as teardrops, but their true shape is more like that of a doorknob, as indicated.

Although it is not shown in Figure 6.7, p orbitals, like s orbitals, increase in size as the principal quantum number n increases. Also not shown are the shapes and sizes of d and f orbitals. We will say more about the nature of d orbitals in Chapter 15. 

The shapes of the five d orbitals are shown in Figure 15.9. These orbitals are given the symbols... 

A subshell with 1 = 2 consists of five d-orbitals. Each d-orbital has four lobes, except for the orbital designated dz , which has a more complicated shape (Fig. 1.37). A subshell with 1=3 consists of seven -orbitals with even more compli cated shapes (Fig. 1.38). 

Other combinations of s-, p-. and d-orbitals can give rise to the same or different shapes, but the combinations in the table are the most common. 

The shapes of the d-orbitals affect the properties of the d-block elements in two ways (see Fig. 1.37) ... 

Powell2 has recently pointed out that in some textbooks the erroneous statement is made that there is no way of choosing the five d orbitals of a subshell so that they are equivalent, and, after mentioning that Kimball3 had discussed five equivalent d orbitals long ago, he has shown that there are in fact two sets of five equivalent d orbitals, and has given expressions for them in terms of the conventional set, in which one differs in shape from the other four. 

Figure 1. Diagram showing the values of d orbitals in the directions of the three principal axes, as a function of the shape parameter a.

The ground term of the cP configuration is F. That of is also F. Those of and d are " F. We shall discuss these patterns in Section 3.10. For the moment, we only note the common occurrence of F terms and ask how they split in an octahedral crystal field. As for the case of the D term above, which splits like the d orbitals because the angular parts of their electron distributions are related, an F term splits up like a set of / orbital electron densities. A set of real / orbitals is shown in Fig. 3-13. Note how they comprise three subsets. One set of three orbitals has major lobes directed along the cartesian x or y or z axes. Another set comprises three orbitals, each formed by a pair of clover-leaf shapes, concentrated about two of the three cartesian planes. The third set comprises just one member, with lobes directed equally to all eight corners of an inscribing cube. In the free ion, of course, all seven / orbitals are degenerate. In an octahedral crystal field, however, the... 

Among atomic orbitals, s orbitals are spherical and have no directionality. Other orbitals are nonspherical, so, in addition to having shape, every orbital points in some direction. Like energy and orbital shape, orbital direction is quantized. Unlike footballs, p, d, and f orbitals have restricted numbers of possible orientations. The magnetic quantum number (fflj) indexes these restrictions. 

The quantum number 1 — 2 corresponds to a d orbital. A d electron can have any of five values for M/(- 2, -1, 0, +1, and + 2), so there are five different orbitals in each set. Each d orbital has two nodal planes. Consequently, the shapes of the d orbitals are more complicated than their s and p counterparts. The contour drawings in Figure 7-23 show these orbitals in the most convenient way. In these drawings, three orbitals look like three-dimensional cloverleaves, each lying in a plane with the lobes pointed between the axes. A subscript identifies the plane in which each lies dxy, dxz, and dyz. A fourth orbital is also a cloverleaf in the... 

The chemistry of all the common elements can be described completely using s, p, and d orbitals, so we need not extend our catalog of orbital shapes to the f orbitals and beyond. 

Figures, and show electron density plots of the = 1, a = 2, and a = 3 orbitals. We extract the shapes of the 12 p, and 3 d orbitals from these graphs. Then we add labels that summarize the screening properties of these orbitals. Screening is provided by small orbitals whose electron density is concentrated inside larger orbitals. In this case, 1 s screens both 2 p and 3 d 2 p screens 3 d, but not 1 s and 3 d screens neither 1 s nor 2 p. The screening patterns can be labeled as shown.

Another influence on the magnitude of the crystal field splitting is the position of the metal in the periodic table. Crystal field splitting energy increases substantially as valence orbitals change from 3 d to 4d to 5 d. Again, orbital shapes explain this trend. Orbital size increases as n increases, and this means that the d orbital set becomes... 

As Fig. 6.9 illustrates, the orbitals are very close in a metal and form an almost continuous band of levels. In fact, it is impossible to detect the separation between levels. The bands behavior is in many respects similarly to the orbitals of the molecule as shown in Fig. 6.8 If there is little overlap between the electrons, the interaction is weak and the band is narrow. Such is the case for d orbitals (Fig. 6.10), which have pronounced shapes and orientations that are largely retained in the metal. Hence the over-... 

Figure 4.2 shows thep and d orhitals. Thep orhitals are dumh-hell shaped, and all hut one d orbital have four lohes. The orbital shapes represent electron probabilities. The chance of finding an electron within the boundary of an orbital is approximately 90%. 

It has been noted in Hay s paper that the occupations for the d1, d4, d6, and d9 states are in principle arbitrary. This does not strictly hold true for density functional applications because of the above-mentioned dependence of the energy on the shape of the occupied orbitals. The density generated from occupying the dz2 differs from the one obtained from placing the electron in, e. g the d orbital. Feeding an approximate density functional with these two unequal densities may lead to non-identical energies (cf. Figure 5-2). In most practical applications, however, the errors introduced in this way should be much smaller than those caused by other limitations of the functional or basis set employed. 

To obtain pictures of the orbital ip = R0< >, we would need to combine a plot of R with that of 0, which requires a fourth dimension. There are two common ways to overcome this problem. One is to plot contour values of ip for a plane through the three-dimensional distribution as shown in Figures 3.8a,c another is to plot the surface of one particular contour in three dimensions, as shown in Figures 3.8b,d. The shapes of these surfaces are referred to as the shape of the orbital. However, plots of the angular function 0 (Figure 3.7) are often used to describe the shape of the orbital ip = RQ because they are simple to draw. This is satisfactory for s orbitals, which have a spherical shape, but it is only a rough approximation to the true shape of p orbitals, which do not consist of two spheres but rather two squashed spheres or doughnut shapes. 

---