Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

D Layer thickness

The factors affecting compaction are (a) aggregate material, (b) bitumen grade and compaction temperature, (c) environmental conditions, (d) layer thickness, (e) compaction equipment and (f) compaction procedure. [Pg.417]

K = absorption coefficient 5 = scattering coefficient d = layer thickness (taken as unity)... [Pg.276]

In order to obtain hydrophobic materials, fluorosilanes in quantities of < 1 mol% were added to the coating sols (see Fig. 21-11, compounds 9,10). This has a favorable effect on the barrier properties to polar permeants such as water vapor (PES/SiO /hybrid polymer WVTR 0.18 g/m d PES/SiO /hydrophobic hybrid polymer WVTR 0.03 g/m d, layer thickness in both cases 4 fim). [Pg.1650]

The concentration of the indicated material (substrate or product) at the indicator electrode surface under steady state conditions depends on the Michaelis constants, the activity of the biologically active compound in the membrane, the thickness of this membrane, and the diffusion coefficients of the substrate and product. It can be shown that for any given system, the response time of the enzyme electrode is given by the ratio d lD (d = layer thickness D = effective diffusion coefficient), except if the rate-determining step is the diffusion of a gas through a gas-permeable membrane, as in the case of the membrane-covered gas sensors. In practice layer thickness as low as 30 jit can be used. Depending on the substrate concentration, response times between 10 seconds and 15 minutes can be achieved. [Pg.103]

D is the final layer thickness and A( the change in surface tension during the passage of the wave. Spread insoluble films give low A(, ie, high penetration depth and maximum dismption. P can be of the order of ten times the droplet size. [Pg.465]

Fig. 2. Schematic of a flat, tethered layer. L is the average layer thickness while d is the average spacing between chain graft points on the surface... Fig. 2. Schematic of a flat, tethered layer. L is the average layer thickness while d is the average spacing between chain graft points on the surface...
Fig. 4. Data of Auroy et al. [25] on polydimethyl-siloxane chains covalently grafted in the interior of a silica porous medium. L is the measured layer thickness from neutron scattering d is the average spacing per chain from the grafting density. The format of the plot is suggested by Eq. 5. The linearity of that relation is seen in these data... Fig. 4. Data of Auroy et al. [25] on polydimethyl-siloxane chains covalently grafted in the interior of a silica porous medium. L is the measured layer thickness from neutron scattering d is the average spacing per chain from the grafting density. The format of the plot is suggested by Eq. 5. The linearity of that relation is seen in these data...
Depth of EB penetration The depth of penetration of energetic electrons into a material at normal angle of incidence is directly proportional to the energy of the electrons and inversely proportional to the density of the material [49,50]. The depth is expressed as a product of penetration distance and the density of the material (i.e., 1 g/cm = 1 cm X 1 g/cm ). The radiation energy and thus the type of electron accelerator to be used are dependent on the required penetration depth, the density of the irradiated material, and the chosen irradiation system. If one measures the density (d) in gram per cubic centimeter (g/cm ) and the layer thickness (T) in millimeter (mm), one can determine the radiation energy ( ) necessary for optimal homogeneity from [40] ... [Pg.858]

With turbulent channel flow the shear rate near the wall is even higher than with laminar flow. Thus, for example, (du/dy) ju = 0.0395 Re u/D is vaHd for turbulent pipe flow with a hydraulically smooth wall. The conditions in this case are even less favourable for uniform stress on particles, as the layer flowing near the wall (boundary layer thickness 6), in which a substantial change in velocity occurs, decreases with increasing Reynolds number according to 6/D = 25 Re", and is very small. Considering that the channel has to be large in comparison with the particles D >dp,so that there is no interference with flow, e.g. at Re = 2300 and D = 10 dp the related boundary layer thickness becomes only approx. 29% of the particle diameter. It shows that even at Re = 2300 no defined stress can be exerted and therefore channels are not suitable model reactors. [Pg.48]

This can be further integrated from the wall to the boundary layer thickness y = 8, where the component is at the bulk concentration Cj,. Substituting / = - o and k = D/o, the mass-transfer coefficient yields the stagnant film model [Brian, Desalination by Reverse Osmosis, Merten (ed.), M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1966, pp. 161-292] ... [Pg.39]

Equation (1) predicts that the rate of release can be constant only if the following parameters are constant (a) surface area, (b) diffusion coefficient, (c) diffusion layer thickness, and (d) concentration difference. These parameters, however, are not easily maintained constant, especially surface area. For spherical particles, the change in surface area can be related to the weight of the particle that is, under the assumption of sink conditions, Eq. (1) can be rewritten as the cube-root dissolution equation ... [Pg.509]

D = diffusion coefficient of drug S = effective surface area of drug particles h = stationary layer thickness Cs = concentration of solution at saturation C = concentration of solute at time t... [Pg.683]

Fig. 5.37 Steady-state concentration distribution (reaction layer) in the case of a chemical volume reaction preceding an electrode reaction (Eq. (5.6.12)) K = 103, kc >oo, A 1 = 0.04s1, D = 10 5cm s i is the effective reaction layer thickness... Fig. 5.37 Steady-state concentration distribution (reaction layer) in the case of a chemical volume reaction preceding an electrode reaction (Eq. (5.6.12)) K = 103, kc >oo, A 1 = 0.04s1, D = 10 5cm s i is the effective reaction layer thickness...
Figure 8.28. Demonstration of a CDF. Data recorded during non-isothermal oriented crystallization of polyethylene at 117°C. Surface plots show the same CDF (a) Linear scale viewed from the top. (b) Linear scale viewed from the bottom, (c) Viewed from the top, logarithmic scale. Indicated are the determination of the most probable layer thickness, lt, and of the maximum layer extension, le. (d) Viewed from the bottom, logarithmic scale. The IDF in fiber direction is indicated by a light line in (a) and (b) (Source [56])... Figure 8.28. Demonstration of a CDF. Data recorded during non-isothermal oriented crystallization of polyethylene at 117°C. Surface plots show the same CDF (a) Linear scale viewed from the top. (b) Linear scale viewed from the bottom, (c) Viewed from the top, logarithmic scale. Indicated are the determination of the most probable layer thickness, lt, and of the maximum layer extension, le. (d) Viewed from the bottom, logarithmic scale. The IDF in fiber direction is indicated by a light line in (a) and (b) (Source [56])...

See other pages where D Layer thickness is mentioned: [Pg.42]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.1060]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.1060]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.1181]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.160]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.18 , Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Layer thickness

Thick layers

© 2024 chempedia.info