D electrons, transition metals

Goals and five limitations in conjunction with the development of selective catalytic homogeneous oxidation systems are evaluated. Systems are presented that address several of the problems or goals. One involves oxidation of alkenes by hypochlorite catalyzed by oxidatively resistant d-electron-transition-metal-substituted (TMSP) complexes. A second involves oxidation of alkenes by H2O2 catalyzed by specific TMSP complexes, and a third addresses functionalization of redox active polyoxometalate complexes with organic groups. 

DO = oxygen donor oxidants (see Table I) LxM" = d-electron transition metal center. 

Zhang, X. Hill, C. L. Alkene Epoxidation by p-Cyano-lV-lV-dimethylaniline IV-oxide Catalyzed by d-Electron-transition-metal-substituted Polyoxometalates. In Catalysis of Organic Reactions. Malz, R. E. J., Ed. Marcel Dekker New York, 1996 pp 445-450. 

The d block transition metals are metals with an incomplete d subshell in at least one of their ions. Try to explain why Sc and Zn are often considered not to be transition metals. Consider the electronic configurations of the Fe + and Fe ions in both spectroscopic and orbital box notations. Use these notations to explain why Fe(lll) compounds are more stable than Fe(ll) compounds. 

According to conventional wisdom transition metals with empty d shells should have spherically symmetric electron densities since there are no d electrons available to cause a distortion. They should therefore have regular coordination environments but, surprisingly, the largest electronic distortions are shown by six-coordinate d° or d cations. Transition-metal cations with empty d shells... 

In 164, no Mn—Mn bond is present and formal double bonding exists between the Mn and Te atoms. The propensity of the 5d transition metals to form M—M bonds may be cited as a reason for these differences, and the situation is similar to the valence isomerism observed in phosphinidene (RP) and sulfenium (SR ) complexes (and their respective heavier congeners) (158-160), in which two types of structures termed open (C) and closed (D) are observed (ML = 16-electron transition metal fragment). 

For systems with heavy atoms we often employ pseudopotential basis sets (frequently relativistic), which reduce the computational burden of large numbers of electrons. Transition metals present problems beyond those of main-group heavy atoms not only can relativistic effects be significant, but electron d- or f-levels, variably perturbed by ligands, make possible several electronic states. DFT calculations, with pseudopotentials, are the standard approach for computations on such compounds. 

The valence electronic structures of d tetrahedral transition metal molecules are of the form... 

The physical significance of the above evaluation of as a basis for estimation of ffads.H s the assumption that chemisorption of H involves formation of a quasi-diatomic M—H bond and that the polarity of this bond is characterized by the electronegativity difference, Xm Xh- Directly determined initial heats of adsorption of H, that is, for -> 0, are found (/4) to be related to d> for transition metals, and this effect originates on account of partial charge transfer in H chemisorption determined by the electron affinity of the metal, -O, and characterized inter alia by Xm - Xh-... 

---