D’Alembert’s principle

The horizontal force of acceleration is Fx = max. By D Alembert s principle the problem may be transformed into one of static equilibrium if the actual accelerating force is replaced by a fictitious inertia force of the same magnitude but the opposite direction, -Fx. The resultant of the gravity force Fy and -Fx is F, and the surface must be normal to the direction of F. Thus tan 0 + ajg. Hence the surface and all planes of equal hydrostatic pressure must be inclined at this angle 0 with the horizontal. 

In the EEM method. Gauss s principle of least constraint is invoked to derive the equations of motion of the system of particles with holonomic constraints. However, it is well known that when holonomic constraints are involved, the equations of motion can be derived from either D Alembert s principle, Hamilton s principle, or by means of a third approach. Application of Gauss s principle in this case offers no advantage over these other approaches. Gauss s principle is also exploited in the EEM method to enforce a nonholonomic temperature constraint in constant-temperature MD simulations. Again, the same equations of motion can be obtained by alternative means. ... 

Jean-Baptiste le Rond d Alembert (1717-1783) published a book entitled Treatise of Dynamics in 1743. It contains d Alembert s principle. Using d Alembert s principle one can convert a dynamics problem into a statics problem. It introduces a concept of inertia force. The inertia force of a particle is the negative mass times acceleration. Thus, Newton s law states that force on a particle is mass times the acceleration, whilst d Alembert s principle states that the particle is balanced under the action of applied force plus inertia force. Thus, F = ma expression for Newton s second law becomes F + -ma) = 0 as d Alembert s expression. Although it is just algebraic expression, it is helpful in solving the complicated problems of dynamics. When a dynamics problem is converted into a statics problem, the well-established methods of statics can be applied. 

The Newton-Euler method is well suited to a recursive formulation of the kinematic and dynamic equations of motion (Pandy and Berme, 1988) however, its main disadvantage is that all of the intersegmental forces must be eliminated before the governing equations of motion can be formed. In an dtemative formulation of the dynamical equations of motion, Kane s method (Kane and Levinson, 1985), which is also referred to as Lagrange s form of D Alembert s principle, makes explicit use of the fact that constraint forces do not contribute directly to the governing equations of motion. It has been shown that Kane s formulation of the dynamical equations of motion is computationally more efficient than its counterpart, the Newton-Euler method (Kane and Levinson, 1983). 

In compliance with Lanczos [118], dF may be called the effective force. As stated by Eq. (3.56b), it reflects the extension of the impressed force resultant dF by the inertia term —a dm. In this way it is possible to reduce a problem of dynamics formally to one of statics and, thus, to deduce the differential equations describing the effects of accelerated motion. This is known as d Alembert s principle. Because of its reactive character, as mentioned by Budo [39] and discussed in Section 3.4.2, the effective force dF does not perform virtual work. With the virtual displacements 6u, it may be written for the particle with the aid of Eq. (3.56b) ... 

For the rigid continumn of volume A consisting of such particles in accelerated motion, the virtual work may be formulated as given by Eq. (3.58). This extension of the principle of virtual displacements is referred to as d Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version ... 

The result of impressed forces dF = dF - - dF yi consists of contributions from volume f and area loads and therefore may be replaced by means of Eqs. (3.10a) and (3.10b). Further on, the density p as given by Eq. (3.54) is introduced. Therewith the final representation of d Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version is obtained ... 

Alternatively, this formulation may be deduced starting from the interior conservation of momentum, Eq. (3.61), which upgrades the interior mechanical equilibrium, Eq. (3.14), with the inertia contributions of d Alembert s principle, Eq. (3.56b). Thereby the derivation steps can be transferred from Section 3.4.2. 

D Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version, as derived in Section 3.4.5, uses infinitesimal virtual displacements about the instantaneous system state. For this reason, it is referred to as a differential principle. When infinitesimal virtual deviations from the entire motion of a system between two instants in time are examined, then it is an integral principle like Hamilton s principle, see Goldstein [86], Sokolnikoff [167], Szabb [172] or Morgenstern and Szaho [126]. Here the derivation from the prior to the latter principle will be demonstrated, starting with conversion of the virtual work of the inertia loads included in Eq. (3.59). With Eq. (3.54) and acceleration as derivative of velocity, it... 

With its substitution into d Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version of Eq. (3.59), one obtains Eq. (3.73). Integration over the period of time from to to ti, where the virtual displacements are zero by definition at these end points such that 5u (to) = 6u (ti) = 0, leads to the general Hamilton s principle of... 

Instead of using d Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version, Lagrange s central equation, Eq, (3.72), may be substituted into the complete principle of virtual work, Eq. (3.41) with (3.62) and (3.63). After the intermediate step of Eq. (3.75), this finally leads to the general Hamilton s principle with an extension to deformable piezoelectric bodies of Eq. (3.76) ... 

D Alembert s principle in the Lagrangian version has been obtained in Section 3.4.5 in terms of virtual displacements and actual accelerations. Since it needs to be accounted for a superimposed guided motion, the position p x,s,t) in the inertial frame of reference, as described by Eq. (7.65), has to be taken into consideration. With the density p s, n) in accordance with Remark 7.1, the virtual work of inertia forces originating from Eq. (3.59) then reads... 

For dynamic conditions, few modification of the static equation is necessary. That can be done by adding the term of inertia force to the equation following d Alembert s principle. Equation 29.25 is modified to the following ... 

Incorporating D Alembert s principle Into the principle of virtual work and assuming no surface traction, the variational equations of motion of body 1 Is written as [7] ... 

---