Correlation energy coupled-cluster theory

Finally, Levchenko and Krylov (2004) have defined spin-flip versions of coupled cluster theories along lines similar to those previously described for SF-CISD. Applications to date have primarily been concerned with the accurate computation of electronically excited states, but the models are equally applicable to computing correlation energies for ground states. 

Most of the models described above have also been implemented at correlated levels of tlieory, including perturbation theory. Cl, and coupled-cluster theory (of course, the DFT SCRF process is correlated by construction of the functional). Unsurprisingly, if a molecule is subject to large correlation effects, so too is the electrostatic component of its solvation free energy. 

The corrections in going from HF to MP2 are large (Table 7.3) and the computational effort increases dramatically for small improvements in energies and geometries. With a limited basis set such as DZP, it is clear that CCSD(T), which should be superior to MP4, cannot five up to its promise because the basis set is too small. A major conclusion is that there must be a good balance between attempted amount of electron correlation recovery and basis set size. It is advisable to use at least triple-f quality type basis sets for highly correlated methods such as coupled cluster theory. 

In two recent publications we have tried to characterize the excited state properties of 1 and 3 in order to facilitate their detection by LIF-spectroscopy. Our main tool in this effort has been equation of motion coupled cluster theory (EOM-CC). The EOM-CCSD method, which is equivalent to linear response CCSD, has been shown to provide an accurate description of both valence and excited states even in systems where electron correlation effects play an important role [39]. Computed transition energies for excitations that are of mainly single substitution character are generally accurate to within 0.1 eV. We have found the EOM-CCSD method to perform particularly well in combination with the doubly-augmented cc-pVDZ (d-aug-cc-pVDZ) basis set. This basis seems to provide equally balanced descriptions of ground and excited states,... 

Tel. 904-392-1597, fax. 904-392-8722, e-mail aces2 qtp.ufl.edu Ab initio molecular orbital code specializing in the evaluation of the correlation energy using many-body perturbation theory and coupled-cluster theory. Analytic gradients of the energy available at MBPT(2), MBPT(3), MBPT(4), and CC levels for restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference functions. MBPT(2) and CC gradients. Also available for ROHE reference functions. UNIX workstations. 

The set of atomic orbitals Xk is called a basis set, and the quality of the basis set will usually dictate the accuracy of the calculations. For example, the interaction energy between an active site and an adsorbate molecule might be seriously overestimated because of excessive basis set superposition error (BSSE) if the number of atomic orbitals taken in Eq. [4] is too small. Note that Hartree-Fock theory does not describe correlated electron motion. Models that go beyond the FiF approximation and take electron correlation into account are termed post-Flartree-Fock models. Extensive reviews of post-HF models based on configurational interaction (Cl) theory, Moller-Plesset (MP) perturbation theory, and coupled-cluster theory can be found in other chapters of this series. ... 

Above we referred to the development of the CC method by Cizek and Paldus [49-51], The CC method may be viewed as a consistent summation to infinite order of certain type of linked correlation (MBPT, MP) diagrams. Thus, there is a clear relationship between many-body permrbation theory [based on the MP operator of Eq. (Al) in Appendix 37A] and coupled cluster theory. Both are supermolecule methods that give size-extensive energies. 

---