Coulomb integrals evaluation

With very, very large systems, fast-multipole methods analogous to those described in Section 2.4.2 can be used to reduce the scaling of Coulomb integral evaluation to linear... 

The coefficients aj may be determined by a least square fit for the expansion. Despite of the fit of the potential V f) the XC-potential (Vxc) only, and the density (p) may be expanded [4]. Such auxiliary basis for the potential enables an analytical calculation of the Hamiltonian matrix elements (A,/ = (< i/A )). Furthermore, the use of auxiliary basis scales down the dependence in the complexity of the Coulomb integral evaluation to a dependence. On the other hand, the introduction... 

In fact, the Coulomb integrals discussed in Section IV.C are available in contemporary quantum chemistry packages. We do not really need to develop our own method to calculate them. However, it is necessary to master the algebra so that we can calculate the matrix elements of the derivatives of the Coulomb potential. In the following, we shall demonstrate the evaluation of these matrix elements. 

The exchange integrals, / are evaluated by representing them as functions of the Coulomb integrals, Hii and the overlap integrals. One such approximation is known as the Wolfsberg-Helmholtz approximation, which is written as... 

It is well known that if the coulomb integrals were to be evaluated directly from the expression... 

For the formulations discussed above (Huckel, Huckel Cl, SCF, and SCF Cl) within the -approximation, the integrals to be evaluated are auu, f uv, Juu, and Jm, which are designated as one-electron coulomb integrals (auu), one-electron resonance integrals (fSUv). one-center, two-electron coulomb integrals (Juu), and two-center, two-electron coulomb integrals (/ ), respectively. 

Several methods have been used for the evaluation of the two-electron coulomb integrals. There is, first of all, the point-charge approximation, as proposed by Pople (1953), or the similar approximation of uniformly charged spheres of Parr (1952) and Pariser and Parr (1952 a). 

Since all of charge transfer, covalency and electron correlations work to decrease the electron-electron repulsion energy, these effects are evaluated quantitatively in terms of the reduction of the Coulomb integrals. 

Since all of the effects of charge transfer, covalency and electron correlation work to decrease the electron-electron repulsion energy, they cam be quantitatively evaluated by the reduction of the Coulomb integrals. For example, in the ligand field theory, the Coulomb integral between the Cg states, J(ee), and the Coulomb integral between the t2g states, are... 

The overlap and Hamiltonian matrix elements over Hermite Gaussians must then be evaluated. The one-electron operators present no special problems and need not be discussed further. The Coulomb integrals are identical to those in Hartree-Fock theory, i.e. 

Several other variants of the Gaussian-LSD approach have been proposed. Kitaura used a Gaussian basis, evaluated the Coulomb integrals... 

The purported N3 dependence of KS methods refers to procedures which reduce the integral evaluation work by fitting the computationally intensive terms in auxiliary basis sets. There are a number of different approaches which are used (and we shall not attempt to cover them all), but these are all more or less variations on a linear least-squares theme. The earliest work along these lines [21, 42], done in the context of Xa calculations, involved the replacement of the density in the Coulomb potential by a model... 

It is clear that the least-squares equations for the model density require only the Coulomb integrals (pv I fj) and (fi I fj), which are 0(N3) and 0(N2) in number, respectively, and therefore the integral evaluation problem is formally reduced by one order to 0(N3). 

---