Correlation energy third order

The formula for the first-order correction to the wave function (eq. (4.37)) similarly only contains contributions from doubly excited determinants. Since knowledge of the first-order wave function allows calculation of the energy up to third order (In - - 1 = 3, eq. (4.34)), it is immediately clear that the third-order energy also only contains contributions from doubly excited determinants. Qualitatively speaking, the MP2 contribution describes the correlation between pairs of electrons while MP3 describes the interaction between pairs. The formula for calculating this contribution is somewhat... 

The third term of Eq (54) is the electronic Hartree potential, whereas the fourth one represents the exchange-correlation potential. This last term is usually obtained from a model exchange-correlation energy functional xc[pl To a first order approximation, the effective KS potential compatible with the electron density p f) given in Eq (51) may be written as ... 

Traditionally, the G3 energy is written in terms of corrections (basis set extensions and correlation energy contributions) to the MP4/d energy. Alternatively, the G3 energy can be specified in terms of HF and perturbation energy components. Denoting the second-, third-, and fourth-order contributions from perturbation theory by E2, E3, and E4, respectively, and the contributions beyond fourth order in a QCISD(T) calculation by EAqci, the G3 energy can be expressed as... 

The zero differential overlap approximation can be applied in the localized representation. This was demonstrated by calculating for C H, CioTfio and C14//14, respectively the total energy corrections and the pair correlation energies through second and third order in different approximations. When the strongly local contributions were only... 

From the last column of the table, we see that the ratio of the parallel-spin to the total correlation energy is remarkably independent of the size of the basis set. Contrary to expectation, the parallel-spin correlation contribution appears to be about as difficult to account for within a finite basis-set approach as the antiparallel-spin correlation. Our investigation does not provide a careful study of the basis-set saturation behavior in MP2 calculations, such as is given in Refs. [74,72,75,33]. However, our results show that, with small- and moderate-sized basis sets which are sufficiently flexible for most purposes and computationally tractable in calculations on larger systems, there is no evidence that the parallel-spin correlation contribution converges more rapidly than the antiparallel-spin contribution. A plausible explanation for this effect is that, for small interelectronic separations, the wavefunction becomes a function of the separation, which is difficult to represent in a finite basis-set approach for either spin channel. The cusp condition of Eq. (19) is a noticeable manifestation of this dependence, but does not imply that the antiparallel-spin channel is more difficult to describe with a moderate-sized basis set than the parallel channel. In fact, in the parallel correlation hole, there is a higher-order cusp condition, relating the second and third derivatives with respect to u [76]. 

Fig. 5. Hugenholtz diagrams for the third order contribution to the correlation energy in the ground state...

Specifically, tetra-excited states are responsible for the cancellation of the incorrect N2 behaviour of the CI-SD, as well as, for the further reduction of the correlation energy. Due to truncation of the MB-RSPT at the third order the effect of doubly excited configurations are not included fully and, of course, the higher excited configurations are omitted completely. 

---