Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Converter types Axial radial flow

Kubec el al. (1974) developed a model for a radial flow quench type converter. Kjaer (1985) and Michael and Filippo (1982) formulated model equations accounting for radial as well as axial variation of temperature and concentration. They found that radial variations have insignificant influence on the model predictions. [Pg.172]

In Haldor Tops0e s ammonia and methanol synthesis processes a series of adiabatic beds with indirect cooling between the beds is normally used, at least in large plants. In smaller plants internally cooled reactors are considered. In ammonia synthesis, the Tops0e solution is today the so-called S-200 converter (Fig. 7) and L6j. This converter type, which is a further development of the S-100 quench-type converter, was developed in the mid seventies the first industrial unit was started up in 1978, and today about 20 are in operation or on order. Both the S-100 and the S-200 reactors are radial flow reactors. The radial flow principle offers some very specific advantages compared to the more normal axial flow. It does, however, also require special catalyst properties. The advantages of the radial flow principle and the special requirements to the catalyst are summarized in Table 5. [Pg.807]

In methanol synthesis, the case for radial flow converters is less obvious. Tops0e has earlier proposed, the use of one-bed radial flow converters in large methanol plants. Later analyses, partly based on a change of catalyst type, have, however, led to the conclusion that axial flow should be preferred even in very large methanol synthesis converters. The reasons for this difference in reactor concept between ammonia synthesis and methanol synthesis are in the differences between the properties of the catalysts. As mentioned above, the ammonia synthesis catalyst is ideally suited for the radial flow principle. This is not true for the methanol synthesis catalyst. The reasons for not using the radial flow principle in methanol synthesis are the following ... [Pg.808]

Stea.m-Ra.ising Converter. There are a variety of tubular steam-raising converters (Fig. 7d) available, which feature radial or axial flow, with the catalyst on either shell or tube side. The near-isothermal operation of this reactor type is the most thermodynamically efficient of the types used, requiring the least catalyst volume. Lower catalyst peak temperatures also result in reduced by-product formation and longer catalyst life. [Pg.280]

The AllO series catalyst, especially AllO-1, AllO-2, is the most widely used catalyst. It has good activity at medimn-temperature, is easy to be reduced, has good thermal stabihty and resistance to toxicity and is similar to Denmark s KM-II series catalyst. The AllO series products can be used in three-pipe and single pipe parallel flow axial converters, as well as various types and sizes of the radial, axis — radial and other converters. [Pg.722]


See other pages where Converter types Axial radial flow is mentioned: [Pg.840]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.2794]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.1074]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1077]    [Pg.74]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.157 ]




SEARCH



Axial flow

Converter types Radial flow

Flow types

Radial flow

© 2024 chempedia.info