Contributions to the interaction energy

The Klopm an-Salem equation partitions contributions to the interaction energy of two molecules into two teams, as they approach each other (equation 29). 

Contents Introduction. - Symmetry An Excursion Through its Formal Apparatus. - Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory A General Approach. - Why Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theories are Needed - Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theories at Low Orders From Ht to the General Case. - The Calculation of the 1-st Order Interaction Energy. - The Second-Order Contribution to the Interaction Energy. -Epilogue. - Appendix A. - Appendix B. -Appendix C. - Appendix D. - References. 

Figure 5.17. Four possible configurations of the ligands occupying two adjacent sites. Only one configuration (RL) contributes to the interaction energy.

Here, only four out of eight possible configurations (Fig. 5.18) contribute to the interaction energy. In terms of the correlation functions, this is equivalent to... 

Figure 5.18. Eight possible configurations of ligands occupying three sites. Only four configurations contribute to the interaction energy.

As it is well known, the Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) affects calculations involving hydrogen bonds [1] and, more generally, intermolecular interaction investigations [2,3], This issue of consistency, as first pointed out in 1968 [4], arises from the use of an incomplete basis set but it does not correspond to the basis set truncation error and it is due to the use of diffuse functions on neighbouring interacting particles, which leads to a non physical contribution to the interaction energy within the complex. 

A fruitful approach to the problem of intermolecular interaction is perturbation theory. The wavefunctions of the two separate interacting molecules are perturbed when the overlap is nonzero, and standard treatment [49] yields separate contributions to the interaction energy, namely the Coulombic, polarization, dispersion, and repulsion terms. Basis-set superposition is no longer a problem because these energies are calculated directly from the perturbed wavefunction and not by difference between dimers and monomers. The separation into intuitive contributions is a special bonus, because these terms can be correlated with intuitive molecular... 

The second dipole acts on the original dipole in a similar fashion, giving a second contribution to the interaction energy that is identical to Equation (10) except that the subscripts are interchanged. The total potential energy of attraction is the sum of these two contributions ... 

FIG. 13.15 Examples of the various contributions to the interaction energies between two polymer-coated particles. The curves shown illustrate qualitatively the change in Gibbs free energy due to the overlap of the tails, loops, and so on. (Redrawn with permission from Sato and Ruch 1980.)... 

A precise description of bonding between triazines and humic substances is complicated by the extreme heterogeneity of humic substances. However, it is clear that all of the above mechanisms contribute to the sorption of triazines and that two or more mechanisms may contribute to the interaction energy for a given molecule. The stereo chemistry of each potential binding site determines which mechanisms are involved. Figures 21.2 and 21.3 summarize the types of interactions that may contribute to the retention of chloro-.v-triazines and protonated-keto-triazines, respectively. 

The dispersion contribution to the interaction energy in small molecular clusters has been extensively studied in the past decades. The expression used in PCM is based on the formulation of the theory expressed in terms of dynamical polarizabilities. The Qdis(r, r ) operator is reworked as the sum of two operators, mono- and bielectronic, both based on the solvent electronic charge distribution averaged over the whole body of the solvent. For the two-electron term there is the need for two properties of the solvent (its refractive index ns, and the first ionization potential) and for a property of the solute, the average transition energy toM. The two operators are inserted in the Hamiltonian (1.2) in the form of a discretized surface integral, with a finite number of elements [15]. 

The absolute value of the denominator is due to integrating the infinite energy interval in two steps, and taking each result separately as a contribution to the interaction energy. The calculation of the interaction energy only involves the computation of the tunneling matrix elements. As... 

The whole procedure can be repeated n times generating - for each pair of occupied orbitals - n optimised virtual orbital pairs, whose contribution to the interaction energy is strictly decreasing up to saturation of the space, i.e. up to the full use of the SCF-MI virtual orbital space. Consistent with the employed basis set, the final MO-VB wavefunction (16) can be so improved to the desired degree of accuracy. 

A part of the electronic energy is not considered in case of ab initio SCF calculations since the electrons of different spins are treated as independent (uncorrelated) within the framework of this approach. If the corresponding energy (correlation energy) is of different magnitude in the complex and in its constituents, the correlation energy contribution to the interaction energy has to be evaluated. 

Even at a separation of 100 A, 1/5 the principal absorption wavelength, there is damping. By a separation / = kabS = 500 A, practically no contribution occurs from the region of the absorption frequency. The effect of retardation screening can also be seen clearly in the changes of the density spectrum of contribution to the interaction energy at different frequencies (see Fig. LI. 14). 

Table 11. Contributions to the interaction energy E(x) between neutral M03C1 molecules (M...

Table 12. Contributions to the interaction energies E(x) between M04 (M = Ru, Os, and Hs) and a) pure quartz surface b) surface covered with 02 c) surface with an effective charge Qe (Q - -0.4). From [114], ...

---