Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor The Adiabatic Case

Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor The Adiabatic Case... 

We have used CO oxidation on Pt to illustrate the evolution of models applied to interpret critical effects in catalytic oxidation reactions. All the above models use concepts concerning the complex detailed mechanism. But, as has been shown previously, critical. effects in oxidation reactions were studied as early as the 1930s. For their interpretation primary attention is paid to the interaction of kinetic dependences with the heat-and-mass transfer law [146], It is likely that in these cases there is still more variety in dynamic behaviour than when we deal with purely kinetic factors. A theory for the non-isothermal continuous stirred tank reactor for first-order reactions was suggested in refs. 152-155. The dynamics of CO oxidation in non-isothermal, in particular adiabatic, reactors has been studied [77-80, 155]. A sufficiently complex dynamic behaviour is also observed in isothermal reactors for CO oxidation by taking into account the diffusion both in pores [71, 147-149] and on the surfaces of catalyst [201, 202]. The simplest model accounting for the combination of kinetic and transport processes is an isothermal continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR). It was Matsuura and Kato [157] who first showed that if the kinetic curve has a maximum peak (this curve is also obtained for CO oxidation [158]), then the isothermal CSTR can have several steady states (see also ref. 203). Recently several authors [3, 76, 118, 156, 159, 160] have applied CSTR models corresponding to the detailed mechanism of catalytic reactions. 

The simplest kinetic reactor model is the CSTR (continuous-stirred-tank reactor), in which the contents are assumed to be perfectly mixed. Thus, the composition and the temperature are assumed to be uniform throughout the reactor volume and equal to the composition and temperature of the reactor effluent However, the fluid elements do not all have the same residence time in the reactor. Rather, there is a residence-time distribution. It is not difficult to provide perfect mixing of the fluid contents of a vessel to approximate a CSTR model in a commercial reactor. A perfectly mixed reactor is used often for homogeneous liquid-phase reactions. The CSTR model is adequate for this case, provided that the reaction takes place under adiabatic or isothermal conditions. Although calculations only involve algebraic equations, they may be nonlinear. Accordingly, a possible complication that must be considered is the existence of multiple solutions, two or more of which may be stable, as shown in the next example. 

There are a variety of limiting forms of equation 8.0.3 that are appropriate for use with different types of reactors and different modes of operation. For stirred tanks the reactor contents are uniform in temperature and composition throughout, and it is possible to write the energy balance over the entire reactor. In the case of a batch reactor, only the first two terms need be retained. For continuous flow systems operating at steady state, the accumulation term disappears. For adiabatic operation in the absence of shaft work effects the energy transfer term is omitted. For the case of semibatch operation it may be necessary to retain all four terms. For tubular flow reactors neither the composition nor the temperature need be independent of position, and the energy balance must be written on a differential element of reactor volume. The resultant differential equation must then be solved in conjunction with the differential equation describing the material balance on the differential element. 

---