Conformations, predicted normal

The influence of solvent can be incorporated in an implicit fashion to yield so-called langevin modes. Although NMA has been applied to allosteric proteins previously, the predictive power of normal mode analysis is intrinsically limited to the regime of fast structural fluctuations. Slow conformational transitions are dominantly found in the regime of anharmonic protein motion. 

Nonnal mode analysis was first applied to proteins in the early 1980s [1-3]. Much of the literature on normal mode analysis of biological molecules concerns the prediction of functionally relevant motions. In these studies it is always assumed that the soft normal modes, i.e., those with the lowest frequencies and largest fluctuations, are the ones that are functionally relevant. The ultimate justification for this assumption must come from comparisons to experimental data. Several studies have been made in which the predictions of a normal mode analysis have been compared to functional transitions derived from two X-ray conformers [4-7]. These smdies do indeed suggest that the low frequency normal modes are functionally relevant, but in no case has it been found that the lowest frequency normal mode corresponds exactly to a functional mode. Indeed, one would not expect this to be the case. 

A number of studies have compared normal mode analysis predictions with results from more realistic simulation techniques or experiments. These studies shed light on the nature of the conformational energy surface and the effect of solvent. 

To obtain qualitative information about a molecule, such as its moleculip orbitals, atomic charges or vibrational normal modes. In some cast semi-empirical methods may also be successfully used to predict energy-trends arising from alternate conformations or substituent effects in qualitative or semi-quantitative way (but care must be taken in this area). 

Heteroatom substituents also introduce polar effects. In the case of a-alkoxy aldehydes the preferred TS appears to be F and G for the E- and Z-enolates, respectively. These differ from the normal Felkin TS for nucleophilic addition. The reactant conformation is believed to be determined by minimization of dipolar repulsion between the alkoxy substituent and the carbonyl group.96 This model predicts higher 3,4-anti ratios for Z-enolates, and this is observed. 

For small-molecule, metal-carbon monoxide complexes, the carbon monoxide ligand is almost always in a linear conformation and perpendicular to the metal. If one assumed bonding of CO to Hb or Mb in its normal linear, perpendicular mode, steric conflicts as illustrated in Figure 4.20 would occur and thus one might predict... 

The importance of conformational isomerism lies in the fact that the predominant shape that molecules adopt is dependent on the energies of the various staggered and eclipsed conformations. In combination they can be used to predict the probable shapes the molecule normally assumes, and these shapes are those which are presented to reagents in solution. 

On that basis, conformers A and E can break down by the loss of the axial alkoxy group. Conforrner can undergo a cleavage via the fission of the carbon-oxygen bond of the ring but conforrner cannot break down (no primary electronic effect). Conforrner must therefore be unreactive and this prediction was verified experimentally (38, 50) by studying the reactivity of the tricyclic orthoester 62 (54-56) which is a perfect rigid model for conforrner , as shown by X-ray analysis (57). Indeed, compound 6 was found completely stable under the mild acid conditions that are normally used for the hydrolysis of other cyclic orthoesters. Thus, conforrner is a remarkably unreactive conforrner which must be eliminated. 

---