Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Configuration-interaction series

The theoretical description based on the lattice or cell models of the liquid uses the language contributing states of occupancy . Nevertheless, these states ot occupancy are not taken to be real, and the models are, fundamentally, of the continuum type. The contribution to the free energy function of different states of occupancy of the basic lattice section is analogous to the contribution to the energy of a quantum mechanical system of terms in a configuration interaction series. [Pg.161]

In principle, one can extract from G(ti)) the complete series of the primary (one-hole, Ih) and excited (shake-up) states of the cation. In practice, one usually restricts the portion of shake-up space to be spanned to the 2h-lp (two-hole, one-particle) states defined by a single-electron transition, neglecting therefore excitations of higher rank (3h-2p, 4h-3p. ..) in the ionized system. In the so-called ADC[3] scheme (22), elertronic correlation effects in the reference ground state are included through third-order. In this scheme, multistate 2h-lp/2h-lp configuration interactions are also accounted for to first-order, whereas the couplings of the Ih and 2h-lp excitation manifolds are of second-order in electronic correlation. [Pg.81]

Basis sets for use in practical Hartree-Fock, density functional, Moller-Plesset and configuration interaction calculations make use of Gaussian-type functions. Gaussian functions are closely related to exponential functions, which are of the form of exact solutions to the one-electron hydrogen atom, and comprise a polynomial in the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) followed by an exponential in r. Several series of Gaussian basis sets now have received widespread use and are thoroughly documented. A summary of all electron basis sets available in Spartan is provided in Table 3-1. Except for STO-3G and 3 -21G, any of these basis sets can be supplemented with additional polarization functions and/or with diffuse functions. It should be noted that minimal (STO-3G) and split-valence (3-2IG) basis sets, which lack polarization functions, are unsuitable for use with correlated models, in particular density functional, configuration interaction and Moller-Plesset models. Discussion is provided in Section II. [Pg.40]

Configuration interaction has come to mean any expansion of the wavefunction in a finite series of N-electron functions (28)... [Pg.42]

In table 2 our result is compared with the UV spectroscopic result of Klein et al. [26], Also shown are the theoretical results of Zhang et al. [2], Plante et al. [27], and Chen et al. [28], The first of these uses perturbation theory, with matrix elements of effective operators derived from the Bethe-Salpeter equation, evaluated with high precision solutions of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. This yields a power series in a and In a. The calculations of Zhang et al. include terms up to O(o5 hi a) but omit terms of 0(ary) a.u. The calculations of Plante et al. use an all orders relativistic perturbation theory method, while those of Chen et al. use relativistic configuration interaction theory. These both obtain all structure terms, up to (Za)4 a.u., and use explicit QED corrections from Drake [29],... [Pg.682]

This series could be continued to include all possible substituted determinants, in which case it would correspond to a full configuration interaction wave function,... [Pg.217]

Predictions can be made about the suitability of different system trajectories on the basis of orbital symmetry conservation rules (207). The most suitable trajectory is an approximation to the reaction path of the reaction under study. The rules can also yield information about the possible structure of the activated complex. The correlation diagram technique has been improved in a series of books by Epiotis et al. (214-216). The method is based on self-consistent field-configuration interaction or valence bond (SCF-CI or VB) (including ionic structures) wave functions. Applications on reactions in the ground states as well as in the excited electronic states are impressive however, the price to be paid for the predictions seems to be rather high. [Pg.273]


See other pages where Configuration-interaction series is mentioned: [Pg.329]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.48 ]




SEARCH



Configuration Interaction

Configurational interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info