Concentration at equilibrium

Consider now a series of extremely dilute solutions, all at the same temperature T, containing these four species at widely different concentrations. At equilibrium the values adopted by xi, x2, x3, and x4 must be such that the ratio x3x4/xlx2 has the same value in each solution, since the unitary term is independent of the concentrations, and the... 

This relation says that the product of the two ion concentrations at equilibrium must be 3.6 X 10-5, regardless of how equilibrium is established. 

Write an equationforthe reaction of chloroacetic acid (Ka = 1.5 X 103) with trimethylamine (Kj, = 5.9 X 10 5). Calculate die equilibrium constant for die reaction. If 0.10 M solutions of these two species are mixed, what will be their concentrations at equilibrium ... 

Again we have visual evidence of concentration at equilibrium since the intensity of the color is fixed by the concentration of the FeSCN+2 ion. The addition of either more ferric ion [by adding... 

C Oxygen concentration at equilibrium with liquid phase, mmolT-1... 

All-or-none transitions occur if the chain length is relatively short (n < 15 tripeptide units) and if the cooperativity is high (a < 1) since in this special case, the concentration of intermediates is negligibly low. Besides, in the case of short chains we may conclude that back folding and oligomerization are negligibly small because of the shortness of the chain ends beyond the helical part. A further simplification is the assumption that only one helical sequence exists, which excludes the formation of loops within a helical part, because of reasons of stability. Under these circumstances, only two different products exist in a measurable concentration at equilibrium. 

Thermodynamics defines the relationship governing the concentrations at equilibrium. The exponents of the equilibrium concentrations in the expression for the equilibrium constant are the same as the stoichiometric coefficients in the net equation, as in... 

Baviere et al. [41] determined the adsorption of C18 AOS onto kaolinite by agitating tubes containing 2 g of kaolinite per 10 g of surfactant solution for 4 h in a thermostat. Solids were separated from the liquid phase by centrifugation and the supernatant liquid titrated for sulfonate. The amount of AOS adsorbed is the difference between initial solution concentration and supernatant solution concentration at equilibrium. 

We use subscripts (eq) to emphasize that the concentrations of reactants and products used in the ratio must be concentrations at equilibrium. 

In some problems, concentrations at equilibrium are provided, hi other problems concentrations at equilibrium must be calculated, usually by using amounts tables (see Chapter In this example, we are told that a solution of LiF at chemical equilibrium has [F ]gg =6.16x 10 M. The stoichiometric ratio of LiF is 1 1, so an equal amount of Li dissolves [Li+]gg = 6.16 X 10 M. 

Now we know two of the three entries in each of the other columns. To complete the table, we apply Equation to each column, obtaining the concentrations at equilibrium for these species ... 

This is a two-step process, so for a reaction with a large. eq we can construct two concentration tables. The first table helps us determine the concentrations at completion, and the second table expresses the concentrations at equilibrium. Example illustrates an equilibrium position close to completion. 

C16-0038. Describe in your own words how to set up and solve a problem that asks for concentrations at equilibrium. 

Most acids and bases are weak. A solution of a weak acid contains the acid and water as major species, and a solution of a weak base contains the base and water as major species. Proton-transfer equilibria determine the concentrations of hydronium ions and hydroxide ions in these solutions. To determine the concentrations at equilibrium, we must apply the general equilibrium strategy to these types of solutions. 

Examples through illustrate the two main types of equilibrium calculations as they apply to solutions of acids and bases. Notice that the techniques are the same as those introduced in Chapter 16 and applied to weak acids in Examples and. We can calculate values of equilibrium constants from a knowledge of concentrations at equilibrium (Examples and), and we can calculate equilibrium concentrations from a knowledge of equilibrium constants and initial concentrations (Examples, and ). 

The equilibrium concentration of Pb ions is stated to be 1.35 X 10 M, but the equilibrium concentration of iodide ions is not stated [Pb2- ],q = 1.35 X iO M[r]g(j — The equilibrium concentration of I is determined by stoichiometric analysis. Initially, the system contains only pure water and solid lead(II) iodide. Enough Pbl2 dissolves to make [Pb ]gq = 1.35 X 10 M. One formula unit of Pbl2 contains one Pb cation and two I" anions. Thus, twice as many iodide ions as lead ions enter the solution. The concentration of I at equilibrium is double that of Pb cations [r],q-2[Pb ],q-2.70 X lO M Substitute the values of the concentrations at equilibrium into the equilibrium expression and calculate the result ... 

Example deals with the second type of calculation, determining a concentration at equilibrium when the value of the solubility product is known. 

The experimental results obtained by measuring ions activity after equilibration with pectins are plotted as binding isotherms [Me +Jb/Cp vs [Me +Jt/Cp where [Me2+]b is the bound cation concentration at equilibrium (equiv.l-i) calculated from measured activity using previously calculated activity coefficients. 

The mode of binding was characterised by replotting experimental data obtained from binding isotherms in terms of the Scatchard representation, [Me +Jb / (Cp.[Me2+]f) vs [Me2+]b/Cp where [Me2+]f corresponds to the final ion concentration at equilibrium. Metal ion concentrations were here expressed in molarity and Cp in number of chain.l l (using the weight-average molecular weights M,). 

Note that in equilibria (2) the subscripts per and cyt are omitted where substrate S is concerned. This is obvious when the binding is measured to a solubilized transport protein, but also in the case where the enzyme is embedded in the membrane of closed vesicular structures, internal and external substrate will have equal concentrations at equilibrium (see Eig. 5). Consequently, the binding is independent of the orientation of the enzyme in the membrane. 

The differences between the two curves can be explained by the sulfonate (the most adsorbed surfactant) monomer concentrations at equilibrium, which were reached in both cases, considering the amounts of surfactants, liquid and solid present. Figure 4 shows a distinct evolution of monomer concentrations for the two solid/liquid ratios considered. 

One way to make Example 19.13 harder is by giving numbers of moles and a volume instead of concentrations at equilibrium. Since the equilibrium constant is defined in terms of concentrations, we must first convert the numbers of moles and volume to concentrations. Note especially that the volume of all the reactants is the same, since they are all in the same system. 

If 1.0 mol of W and 3.0mol of Q are placed in a 1.0-L vessel and allowed to come to equilibrium, calculate the equilibrium concentration of Z using the following steps (a) If the equilibrium concentration of Z is equal to x, how much Z was produced by the chemical reaction (b) How much R was produced by the chemical reaction (c) How much W and Q were used up by the reaction (d) How much W is left at equilibrium (e) How much Q is left at equilibrium (/) With the value of the equilibrium constant given, will x (equal to the Z concentration at equilibrium) be significant when subtracted from 1.0 (g) Approximately what concentrations of W and Q will be present at equilibrium (/t) What is the value of x (/) What is the concentration of R at equilibrium (7) Is the answer to part (/) justified ... 

In the condensation of alkyl methyl ketones with esters, the primary hydrogen is the one lost as in the reactions previously discussed with carbon dioxide, aldehydes, etc. The reaction is with the more rapidly formed and less hindered ion rather than with the ion that would be present in higher concentration at equilibrium. 

Care the values of K from these equations are only meaningful for concentrations at equilibrium. 

In kinetics, we often term the concentrations at equilibrium the infinity concentration . The Rcactolitc glasses do not become... 

Finally, substitute the concentrations (at equilibrium) into the equilibrium expression. 

Step 4 Take the concentrations at equilibrium and substitute them into the equilibrium expression. 

Step 3 Set up a chart showing initial concentrations of the species and final concentrations at equilibrium (the CL does not contribute to the pH). Let x represent the portion of NH3 that eventually converts to NH/. x will also represent the amount by which the concentration of NH4+ increases. 

Species Initial Concentration Final Concentration at Equilibrium... 

Step 2 Create a chart that expresses initial and final concentrations (at equilibrium) of the species. 

Step 3 Create a chart showing initial and final concentrations (at equilibrium) of the involved species. Let x be the amount of C2H5NH3+ that forms from C2H5NH2. Because C2H5NH3+ is in a 1 1 molar ratio with OH, [OH ] also equals x. 

By combining these expressions for defect chemical potentials and coefficients with the relations between the chemical potentials at equilibrium (for example Eqs. (74)) explicit expressions are obtained for the defect concentrations at equilibrium which are quite analogous to the quasi-chemical results (Section IV- A) apart from the presence of the activity coefficients. We consider examples of these equations in later sections. 

---