Complex rotation method Hamiltonian

In this context, the idea of discrete numerical basis sets, introduced by Sa-lomonson and Oster (129) for the bound-state problem and combined with the complex-rotation method by Lindroth (30), is very interesting. One-particle basis functions are defined on a discrete grid inside a spherical box containing the system under cosideration. The functions are evaluated by diagonalizing the discretized one-particle complex-rotated Hamiltonian. Such basis sets are then used to compute autoionizing state parameters by means of bound-state methods (30,31,66). 

To summarize, for our model Hamiltonian, resonances appear after a bound-virtual and a virtual-virtual resonance transition. There is no method to obtain virtual energies using a square-integrable basis set, even in the complex-rotated formalism. Then, at this point we can ask if FSS is a useful method to study this kind of resonance. As we will show in the next subsection, the answer is yes FSS is a method to obtain near-threshold properties, and with FSS we can characterize the near-threshold resonances by solving the Hermitian (not complex-rotated) Hamiltonian using a real square-integrable basis-set expansion. Moreover, the critical point of the virtual resonance-resonance transition, Xr, could also be obtained using FSS. 

The complex coordinate rotation (CCR) or complex scaling method (5,6,10,19) is directly based on the ABCS theory (1-3), therefore Reinhardt (5) also called it the direct approach. A complex rotated Hamiltonian, H 0), is obtained from the electron Hamiltonian of the atom, H, by replacing the radial coordinates r by re, where 0 is a real parameter. The eigenproblem of this non-Hermitian operator is solved variationally in a basis of square-integrable functions. The matrix representation of H ) is obtained by simple scaling of matrices T and V representing the kinetic and Coulomb potential part of the unrotated Hamiltonian H,... 

Unlike the above mentioned methods, another Floquet-theorem-based approach, the many-electron many-photon theory (MEMPT) of Mercouris and Nicolaides (71,72) does not involve complex rotated Hamiltonians. The complex coordinate rotation is used only to regularize that part of the wave functions which describes unbound electrons (see the CESE method). This allows efficient description of bound or quasi-bound states, involved in a problem under consideration, by MCHF solutions and therefore enables ab initio application to many-electron systems (71,72,83-87). 

A new treatment for S = 7/2 systems has been undertaken by Rast and coworkers [78, 79]. They assume that in complexes with ligands like DTPA, the crystal field symmetry for Gd3+ produces a static ZFS, and construct a spin Hamiltonian that explicitly considers the random rotational motion of the molecular complex. They identify a magnitude for this static ZFS, called a2, and a correlation time for the rotational motion, called rr. They also construct a dynamic or transient ZFS with a simple correlation function of the form (BT)2 e t/TV. Analyzing the two Hamiltonians (Rast s and HL), it can be shown that at the level of second order, Rast s parameter a2 is exactly equivalent to the parameter A. The method has been applied to the analysis of the frequency dependence of the line width (ABpp) of GdDTPA. These results are compared to a HL treatment by Clarkson et al. in Table 2. 

Previous fully quantum mechanical studies of predissociation phenomena in triatomic molecules do not, to our knowledge, use a Hamiltonian that has a non-zero total angular momentum. Tennyson et al[43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51] solve the same equations as we do but have not yet, to our knowledge, treated any predissociation problems. The adiabatic rotation approximation method of Carter and Bowman[52] plus a complex C2 modification have, on the other hand, been used to compute rovibrational energies and widths in the HCO[53, 54] and HOCl[55, 56, 57] molecules. This method is based upon the the Wilson and Howard[58], Darling and Dennison[59] and Watson[60] formalism. It is less transparent but the exact formalism in refs.[58, 59, 60] is equivalent to the one presented here and in ref [43]. While both we and Tennyson et al[43] include the exact Hamiltonian in our formalism the latter authors 152] use an approximate method which they have analysed and motivated. 

The computational use of complex scaling of coordinates in the Hamiltonian is normally called the "complex coordinate rotation" (CCR) method. A brief reference to it is given in Sections 3.3 and 5.1, with references to related review articles. 

The underlying idea behind the complex coordinate rotation (CCR) method " that is suggested by the Balslev-Combes theorem is a complex scaling of the Cartesian coordinates in the Hamiltonian operator, each by the same complex phase factor x xe. This transformation defines a new, complex-scaled Hamiltonian, H H 0). In one dimension (for simplicity), the complex-scaled Hamiltonian is... 

---