Complex function orthonormality

The bra n denotes a complex conjugate wave function with quantum number n standing to the of the operator, while the ket m), denotes a wave function with quantum number m standing to the right of the operator, and the combined bracket denotes that the whole expression should be integrated over all coordinates. Such a bracket is often referred to as a matrix element. The orthonormality condition eq. (3.5) can then be written as. 

The orthonormality of the (271) 2 e 1(0t functions will be demonstrated explicitly later. Before doing so however, it is useful to review both complex numbers and basis sets. 

If we now multiply both sides of the equation by, the complex conjugate of ipmt and integrate over all space, we obtain the following equation as a result of the orthonormality properties of the functions ftn ... 

We start by constructing an orthonormal basis a, b, c (where c is a unit vector along the wavevector k, with a and b in the two-dimensional vector space orthogonal to k). The significance of this ansatz is that any vector function F(x,y,z) is divergence free if and only if its Fourier coefficients F(k) are orthogonal to k, that is if k -F(k) =0. Thus, F(k) is a linear combination of a(k) and b(k). Lesieur defines the complex helical waves as... 

The general theory of electronic structure of complex systems and their PES are based on the tacit assumption that the basis orbitals are well defined orthonormal functions, which can be conveniently divided into two (or more if necessary) classes. The reality is much more tough and results in serious conceptual problems in all the existing packages offering hybrid modelization techniques in their respective menus. These have been addressed in the previous section. Now we address the meaning of the results obtained so far. In fact, up to this point, we obtained the description suitable for any hybrid QM/QM method. Within this context, the distribution of orbitals... 

The method is an approximate self-consistent-field (SCF) ab initio method, as it contains no empirical parameters. All of the SCF matrix elements depend entirely on the geometry and basis set, which must be orthonormal atomic orbitals. Originally, the impetus for its development was to mimic Hartree-Fock-Roothaan [5] (HFR) calculations especially for large transition metal complexes where full HFR calculations were still impossible (40 years ago). However, as we will show here, the method may be better described as an approximate Kohn-Sham (KS) density functional theory (DFT)... 

In the CESE procedure, the coordinates of the Hamiltonian (40) are left real. The total function space is formally divided info two multi-dimensional parts of N-elecfron wavefuncfions, say Q and P, nof necessarily orthonormal between them. The Q space is fixed by considering judiciously the electronic structure and spectrum of the system under study. The P space is not completely fixed. It contains parameterized configurations with real as well as complex orbitals representing contributions from fhe multichannel high Rydberg and scattering states. It is the variational optimization of this space via the diagonalization of fhe matrix... 

Spatial symmetry operations are linear transformations of a coordinate function space. When choosing the space in orthonormal form, symmetry operations will conserve orthonormality, and hence all transformations will be carried out by unitary matrices. This will be the case for all spatial representation matrices in this book. When all elements of a unitary matrix are real, it is called an orthogonal matrix. As unitary matrices, orthogonal matrices have the same properties except that complex conjugation leaves them unchanged. The determinant of an orthogonal matrix wiU thus be equal to 1. The rotation matrices in Chap. 1 are all orthogonal and have determinant -I-1. 

Each microphase has its own symmetry and unit cell, and a full solution to the NSCF problem must be consistent with them. For example, the unit cell for the cylindrical phase is hexagonal, that for bcc is the appropriate Wigner-Seitz cell, and so on. The early NSCFT calculations approximated the unit cells for the latter two phases by cylinders and spheres, respectively. Matsen and Schick eliminated this unit cell approximation (UCA), by expanding each function of position in a series of orthonormal basis functions, each of which has the full symmetry of the phase under consideration. This provides a more accurate description of the C and S phases and, most importantly, permits the treatment of the more complex, nonclassical phases. 

The overlap of the F function with itself is the dot product of the coefficient vector and its complex conjugate transpose if, as we assume here, the basis functions are orthonormal. 

The Hartree-Fock method can be applied to truly large molecules containing several hundred atoms. For such systems, it becomes impossible to construct a set of orthonormal orbitals (5.1.5), much less a set of canonical orbitals. However, as we shall see in Chapter 10, all information about the Hartree-Fock wave function is contained in the one-electron density matrix, which may be expressed directly in the basis of AOs. For large molecules, the density-matrix elements can be optimized by an algorithm whose complexity scales linearly with the size of the system. 

---