Comparison of Random Packings from Different Generations

4 Comparison of random packings from different generations 

MiniRing (CMR ) (6) Hiflow ring. (Part a, courtesy ofGlitsch, Inc. part b, courtesy of Rausckert Induetries. Inc.) 

Due to the approximations, Fig. 8.7 is unsuitable for comparative evaluation among different third-generation packings. References to the manufacturers have therefore been omitted. The values plotted on Fig. 8.7 were arbitrarily connected by straight lines. 

Figur S.6 Miscellaneous random packings, to) VSP. (6 lnterpadc (Ports o and b 

Packing material selection is primarily based on the corrosion resistance. The factors below are fdso important. Reference 16 has an excellent detailed discussion. 

---