Clusters perturbation theory

The reduced units are L = L/a, T = kT/e and p = pa. MD denotes the molecular dynamics results,CPT denotes the results of McGuigan et al. using cluster perturbation theory, and PTl denotes the results from first-order perturbation theory. ... 

In conclusion, it is possible to restructure the M0ller-Plesset energy and wave-function corrections such that their separability and size-extensivity become apparent. However, the separability of the corrections is not obvious in the original formulation of M0ller-Plesset theory but becomes transparent only when commutators are introduced. In Section 14.3, we shall develop coupled-cluster perturbation theory, where the connected (termwise size-extensive) commutator form arises naturally, without the need to restructure the expressions by hand. 

The zero-order wave functions are the Hartree-Fock state and the excited determinants (14.3.3). In coupled-cluster perturbation theory (CCPT), we expand the full coupled-cluster wave function... 

First-principles models of solid surfaces and adsorption and reaction of atoms and molecules on those surfaces range from ab initio quantum chemistry (HF configuration interaction (Cl), perturbation theory (PT), etc for details see chapter B3.1 ) on small, finite clusters of atoms to HF or DFT on two-dimensionally infinite slabs. In between these... 

A number of types of calculations begin with a HF calculation and then correct for correlation. Some of these methods are Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MPn, where n is the order of correction), the generalized valence bond (GVB) method, multi-conhgurational self-consistent held (MCSCF), conhgu-ration interaction (Cl), and coupled cluster theory (CC). As a group, these methods are referred to as correlated calculations. 

There are three main methods for calculating electron correlation Configuration Interaction (Cl), Many Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT) and Coupled Cluster (CC). A word of caution before we describe these methods in more details. The Slater determinants are composed of spin-MOs, but since the Hamilton operator is independent of spin, the spin dependence can be factored out. Furthermore, to facilitate notation, it is often assumed that the HF determinant is of the RHF type. Finally, many of the expressions below involve double summations over identical sets of functions. To ensure only the unique terms are included, one of the summation indices must be restricted. Alternatively, both indices can be allowed to run over all values, and the overcounting corrected by a factor of 1/2. Various combinations of these assumptions result in final expressions which differ by factors of 1 /2, 1/4 etc. from those given here. In the present book the MOs are always spin-MOs, and conversion of a restricted summation to an unrestricted is always noted explicitly. 

Connections between Coupled Cluster, Configuration Interaction and Perturbation Theory... 

COUPLED CLUSTER, CONFIGURATION INTERACTION AND PERTURBATION THEORY... 

Coupled cluster is closely connected with Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory, as mentioned at the start of this section. The infinite Taylor expansion of the exponential operator (eq. (4.46)) ensures that the contributions from a given excitation level are included to infinite order. Perturbation theory indicates that doubles are the most important, they are the only contributors to MP2 and MP3. At fourth order, there are contributions from singles, doubles, triples and quadruples. The MP4 quadruples... 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

However, due to the availability of numerous techniques, it is important to point out here the differences and equivalence between schemes. To summarize, two EDA families can be applied to force field parametrization. The first EDA type of approach is labelled SAPT (Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory). It uses non orthogonal orbitals and recomputes the total interaction upon perturbation theory. As computations can be performed up to the Coupled-Cluster Singles Doubles (CCSD) level, SAPT can be seen as a reference method. However, due to the cost of the use of non-orthogonal molecular orbitals, pure SAPT approaches remain limited... 

---