Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Charge constraint

The potential of AMT in FT-ICR-MS was already discnssed [31-33], If an AMT can be isotope-coded, the same strategy can be applied to quantitative proteomics. One of the problems of FT-ICR-MS in quantitative proteomics is the space charging constraint of the FT-ICR cell. Data-dependent selective ejection of highly abundant ions and prolonged accumulation of low-abundant ions in the external quadrapole, prior to ion transfer to the FT-ICR cell, helps in extending the dynamic range of the method [108],... [Pg.510]

The first equation shows that the center of the quasiparticle bands lies at an energy above the original conduction band Fermi level. This should be compared with the position Tg = aT of the Kondo resonance in the impurity model. The second equation simply results from the charge constraint QflN = g, which is now enforced only on the average in contrast to the impurity model. The occupation f(0) is obtained by setting equal to the actual value of 1 IN. The quasiparticle bands are the result of a hybridization with an effective strength K Here r iT) is the average fraction of sites without f occupation,... [Pg.309]

Xi is the Lagrange multiplier of molecule i in the case of constraint 2 and X in the case of constraint 1. Using the fact that the total charge (constraint 1) or the molecular charge (constraint 2) are constants of the motion, one finds the following expressions for the Lagrange multipUers ... [Pg.131]

Here, Wp, Wg are the collective fields experienced by the monomers and solvent, respectively, and Qp,Qg represent their respective collective densities. All charged species (excluding the ion-pairs formed due to adsorption of counterions) experience a field t ) (which is equivalent to the electrostatic potential), t) and u are Lagrange s multipliers corresponding to, respectively, the incompressibility and net charge constraints in the partition function. [Pg.324]

Physticochemical coiiatrainla Further constraints can be imposed on the atoms and bonds of the reaction center, such as those physicochemical factors calculated by the PETRA package (see Section 7.1). For example, the partial charges calculated by the PEOE method can be used to extract the chemically feasible reaction from the two conceivable ones as illustrated in Figure 10.3-11. [Pg.552]

The exacting Hst of specification requirements for aviation gas turbine fuels and the constraints imposed by deUvering clean fuel safely from refinery to aircraft are the factors that affect the economics. Compared with other distillates such as diesel and burner fuels, kerosene jet fuels are narrow-cut specialized products, and usually command a premium price over other distillates. The prices charged for jet fuels tend to escalate with the basic price of cmde, a factor which seriously underrnined airline profits during the Persian Gulf war as cmde prices increased sharply. [Pg.417]

The density fitting functions may or may not be the same as those used in expanding the orbitals. The fitting constants a are chosen so that the Coulomb energy arising from the difference between the exact and fitted densities is minimized, subject to the constraint of charge conservation. The J integrals then become... [Pg.191]

Fitting atomic charges to give a best match to a calculated electrostatic potential. The constraint is that the sum of atomic charges should equal the net charge of the molecule. [Pg.338]

In most units, the increase in hydrogen make does not increase coke yield the coke yield in a cat cracker is constant (Chapter 5). The coke yield does not go up because other unit constraints, such as the regenerator temperature and/or wet gas compressor, force the operator to reduce charge or severity. High hydrogen yield also affects the recovery of Cj-H components in the gas plant. Hydrogen works as an inert and changes the liquid-vapor ratio in the absorbers. [Pg.64]

Crystal-field theory (CFT) was constructed as the first theoretical model to account for these spectral differences. Its central idea is simple in the extreme. In free atoms and ions, all electrons, but for our interests particularly the outer or non-core electrons, are subject to three main energetic constraints a) they possess kinetic energy, b) they are attracted to the nucleus and c) they repel one another. (We shall put that a little more exactly, and symbolically, later). Within the environment of other ions, as for example within the lattice of a crystal, those electrons are expected to be subject also to one further constraint. Namely, they will be affected by the non-spherical electric field established by the surrounding ions. That electric field was called the crystalline field , but we now simply call it the crystal field . Since we are almost exclusively concerned with the spectral and other properties of positively charged transition-metal ions surrounded by anions of the lattice, the effect of the crystal field is to repel the electrons. [Pg.27]

Croup II (Ca, Na). This group includes the remaining cations with relatively long residence times. One important constraint is the charge balance of seawater, re-arranged in the following format ... [Pg.270]

Psueudopotentials should satisfy several basic requirements. For example, the pseudo and real

wave functions must be identical outside the core radius (>rc), not only in their spatial dependence but also in their absolute magnitudes such that two wave functions generate identical charge densities. The equality of the two types of wave functions outside the core radius in this context is guaranteed by imposing the following constraint ... [Pg.20]

The most difficult problem of risk evaluation linked to chemicals will be discussed in this Part. This is primarily a medical problem, which therefore comes within the competence of the company medical officer and epidemiologists, but neverthel need not only be dealt with by them. The person in charge of safety control in a place where chemicals are handled also has to tackle this problem. This person will have to take into account the level of toxicity risk of a substance. This will determine the constraint level of the measures to be taken, its favoured means of penetration, which depends on the activity, and its penetration properties specific to the organism. The physical properties of the substance (which will determine the nature of the precautions to be taken) and also the values of toxicity parameters have to be taken into account. He has to check the container labelling and know how to interpret and explain the toxicity instructions on this labelling. [Pg.125]


See other pages where Charge constraint is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.119]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.457 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info