Catalytic cycles phosphine-free

Scheme 1-12 Catalytic Cycle for Phosphine-Free Rh(l) Complexes...

The potential energy surface for the hydroformylation of ethylene has been mapped out for several catalytic model systems at various levels of theory. In 1997, Morokuma and co-workers [17], considering HRh(CO)2(PH3) as the unsaturated catalytic species that coordinates alkene, reported free energies for the full catalytic cycle at the ab initio MP2//RHF level. Recently, in 2001, Decker and Cundari [18] published CCSD(T)//B3LYP results for the HRh(CO)(PH3)2 catalytic complex, which would persist under high phosphine concentrations. Potential energy surfaces for both Rh-catalyzed model systems were qualitatively very similar. The catalytic cycle has no large barriers or deep thermodynamic wells to trap the... 

As a consequence of the higher coordination energy, the dicarbene complexes 53 disfavor a dissociative pathway similar to that of 52. A mixed NHC/phosphine complex of type 54, however, reveals a phosphine dissociation energy in the same order of magnitude as 52. Therefore, 54 is able to populate the dissociative pathway just as readily as 52. In contrast to 52, however, a phosphine-free species 58 is to be considered as the key intermediate in the catalytic cycle. 

It is worthy to note here that the methylidene complex 11 is a poor initiator for olefin metathesis reactions at room temperature. Although this complex can undergo multiple catalytic turnovers, if it is intercepted by free phosphine ligand, it becomes incapable of reentering the metathesis catalytic cycle.32... 

When aryl halides were applied in catalytic coupling reactions, the mechanistic evidence points to initial SET reduction by low-valent nickel phosphine species (selected investigations in [23, 24]). The competition of cage collapse to ArNi(PR3)2X vs. dissociation of the aryl halide radical anion to a free radical and Ni(I) complexes determines the cross-coupling manifolds. Thus, Ni(0)-Ni(II) and Ni(I)-Ni(III) catalytic cycles can occur interwoven with each other and a distinction may be difficult. Common to both is that the coupling process with aryl halides is likely to occur by a two-electron oxidative addition/reductive elimination pathway. 

The carbonylation of aryl halides with alcohols and amines catalysed by palladium complexes with triphenylphosphine ligand is the convergent and direct route to the synthesis of aromatic esters as well as aromatic amides. Even though these palladium complexes are widely employed as the best catalytic system, those catalysts are difficult to separate and reuse for the reaction without further processing. The major drawbacks are oxidation of triphenylphosphine to phosphine oxide, reduction of palladium complex to metal and termination of the catalytic cycle. The phosphine-free, thermally stable and air resistant catalyst (1) containing a carbon-palladium covalent bond (Figure 12.3) has been found to be a highly selective and efficient catalyst for the carbonylation of aryl iodides.[1]... 

It was shown that palladacydes 1 [3c, 24] prepared from palladium] I) acetate and tris(o-tolyl)- or trimesitylphosphine are excellent catalysts for the Heck coupHng of triflates and halides including certain aryl chlorides. In some of these cases, a possible involvement of oxidation states +II and +IV in the catalytic cycle has been considered [25]. Similarly, other palladacydes such as 3 [26e,h] or 6 [27] have been used in the Heck reactions (Figure 8.1) [24, 26, 28]. It has been proposed that, at least for NC palladacydes, the reaction proceeds through the classical phosphine-free Pd(0)/Pd(II) catalytic cycle and that the active catalysts are actually slowly formed palladium clusters [29]. Besides classical palladacydes, complexes with pincer-type ligands such as 2 [30] have become very popular in palladium catalysis [31]. 

---