Cases v. United States

In modem society, a search is premised upon a person s right to privacy, rather than traditional physical trespass. The Amendment protects people, not places. In Katz v. United States [24] the Court rejected the property approach in favor of a privacy approach. The Supreme Court held a nontresspassory eavesdropping into a public telephone booth constituted a search. The Court focused on the privacy aspect of the amendment, rather than applying it to specific location. The Court declined to characterize a telephone booth as a constitutionally protected area. A search occurs when (1) a person s subjective expectation of privacy is invaded providing (2) society is prepared to recognize that expectation is reasonable. The definition of reasonableness is itself determined on a case by case basis [37]. 

Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 697 (1996) with case text. 

Federal legislation for the postwar South led the Supreme Court to its first major confrontation with the Second Amendment. The case of United States V. Cruikshank (1876) arose from the trial of a band of white farmers (and probable KKK members) who had attacked and burned a courthouse... 

Not unconstitutional as an invasion of the reserved powers of the States. Citing Sonzinsky v. United States, 300 U. S. 506, and Narcotic Act cases. 

Classe JG. The eye opening case of Ketr v. United States. J Am OptomAssoc 1989 60 471-476. 

Koenig v. United States, case 86-CV-10269-BC, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (Jan. 20,1989). 

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 541 F. Supp 1367 (1982b), Sierra Club, et al.. Plaintiffs, v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et at. Defendants. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 614 F. Supp. 1475 (1985), Sierra Club et al. Plaintiffs, v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al. Defendants. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). Office of Research Integrity, http //ori.dhhs.gov/case summary... 

See for example the International Court of Justice (1952) Rights of United States Nationals in Morocco Judgement Case Concerning the Rights of United States Nationals in Morocco (France V. United States of America), 27 August 1952 I.C.J. Reports 1952, pp. 176, at pp. 200, 209. Akehurst (1977), p. 6. 

Para. 188 International Court of Justice (1986) Nicaragua Case Judgement on the Merits Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), 27 June 1986 I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 14. 

United States v. L.J. Helder, U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, Case No. 8 02-M-64, Affidavit for Complain by FBI Agent Mark Havrin (8 May 2002). 

Militia and military weapons Andrews v. State Presserv. Illinois City of Salina v. Blaksley United States v. Miller Cases v. U.S U.S. v. Warin... 

---