Carcinogenicity determination

CONSENSUS REPORTS Carcinogenic Determination Indefinite lARC 9,245,75. SAFETY PROFILE When heated to decomposition it emits acrid smoke and irritating fumes. 

Groopman, J. D and Donahue, K. F. (1988). Aflatoxin, a human carcinogen Determination in foods and biological samples by monoclonal antibody affinity chromatography. J. Axsoc. Off-Anal. Chem. 71. 861-867. 

At one time benzene was widely used as a solvent This use virtually disappeared when statistical studies revealed an increased incidence of leukemia among workers exposed to atmospheric levels of benzene as low as 1 ppm Toluene has replaced benzene as an inexpensive organic solvent because it has similar solvent properties but has not been determined to be carcinogenic m the cell systems and at the dose levels that benzene is... 

The toxicity of both feeds and products must be carefully considered during the preliminary design stages (53,54) especially if the feeds or products contain known or suspected carcinogens. Special testing may even be requked prior to operation to determine the toxicity of unknown materials. 

Safety is assessed by subjecting the antioxidant to a series of animal toxicity tests, eg, oral, inhalation, eye, and skin tests. Mutagenicity tests are also carried out to determine possible or potential carcinogenicity. Stabilizers are being granulated and Hquid products are receiving greater acceptance to minimize the inhalation of dust and to improve flow characteristics. 

Chemical and common names of all ingredients determined to be healtli liazards mid comprising less than 1 percent (0.1 percent for carcinogens) of tlie mi.xlure must also be listed if they can still exceed an established OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) or tlic ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) or present a health risk to exposed employees in tlicsc concentrations. The next chapter will address PELs and TLVs in further detail. 

This section describes how the tj pes of to.xicity inforniation arc considered in the to.xicity assessment for carcinogenic effects. A slope factor and the accompanying weight of evidence determination are the toxicity data most commonly used to evaluate potential human carcinogenic risks. The methods the USEPA uses to derive these values arc outlined below. 

In the first step of the evaluation, the available data are evaluated to determine the likelihood that the agent is a human carcinogen. The evidence is characterized separately for human studies and animal studies as sufficient. 

Another interesting, but rather complex system, which couples flow injection analysis, EC and GC has been recently reported (47). This system allows the determination of the total amount of potentially carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) in bitumen and bitumen fumes. This system could also be used for the analysis of specific PACs in other residual products. 

Discussion. General procedures for the determination of nitrites are usually based upon some form of diazotisation reaction, often involving carcinogenic materials such as the naphthylamines. In the following method these compounds are avoided. 

Antimonate, hexafluoro-, 3, 276 Antimonate, tris(cthyl dithioearbonate)-electron pair, 1, 37 Antimonates, 3, 265 Antimonic acids, 3, 265 Antimony, 3, 237-294 biology, 3,277 carcinogenicity, 3, 278 coordination number, 3, 256 determination... 

Dioxane is an impurity present in alcohol ethoxy sulfates formed during sulfation of the ethoxylated alcohol. 1,4-Dioxane is a carcinogen in rats and mice [312-314] and has been considered as a possible carcinogen to humans [315-317]. However, the no-effect dose in rats is equivalent to a daily intake of dioxane of 9.6-19.0 mg/kg/day, which corresponds to 0.672 g/day for humans. In other studies it has been determined that the threshold for onset of human toxicity of 1,4-dioxane lies above an intake of 76 mg/kg in adult males [318]. Although it seems to be demonstrated that amounts up to 1000 ppm of... 

---