Captodative effect rotational barriers

The experimental result seems to support this model. Table 11 lists values for rotational barriers in some allyl radicals (Sustmann, 1986). It includes the rotational barrier in the isomeric 1-cyano-l-methoxyallyl radicals [32]/ [33] (Korth et al., 1984). In order to see whether the magnitude of the rotational barriers discloses a special captodative effect it is necessary to compare the monocaptor and donor-substituted radicals with disubstituted analogues. As is expected on the basis of the general influence of substituents on radical centres, both captor and donor substituents lower the rotational barrier, the captor substituent to a greater extent. Disubstitution by the same substituent, i.e. dicaptor- and didonor-substituted systems, do not even show additivity in the reduction of the rotational barrier. This phenomenon appears to be a general one and has led to the conclusion that additivity of substituent effects is already a manifestation of a special behaviour, viz., of a captodative effect. The barrier in the 1-cyano-l-methoxyallyl radicals [32]/... 

Several attempts have been made to analyse the captodative effect through rotational barriers in free radicals. This approach seems to be well suited as it is concerned directly with the radical, i.e. peculiarities associated with bond-breaking processes do not apply. However, in these cases also one has to be aware that any influence of a substituent on the barrier height for rotation is the result of its action in the ground state of the molecule and in the transition structure for rotation. Stabilization as well as destabilization of the two states could be involved. Each case has to be looked at individually and it is clear that this will provide a trend analysis rather than an absolute determination of the magnitude of substituent effects. In this respect the analysis of rotational barriers bears similar drawbacks to all of the other methods. 

The study of substituted allyl radicals (Sustmann and Brandes, 1976 Sustmann and Trill, 1974 Sustmann et al., 1972, 1977), where pronounced substituent effects were found as compared to the barrier in the parent system (Korth et al., 1981), initiated a study of the rotational barrier in a captodative-substituted allyl radical [32]/[33] (Korth et al., 1984). The concept behind these studies is derived from the stabilization of free radicals by delocalization of the unpaired spin (see, for instance, Walton, 1984). The... 

An error-propagation analysis allows the conclusion that the captodative substituent effect on the rotational barrier in this allyl radical is at least additive and perhaps slightly greater. 

Benzylic radicals offer themselves to a similar analysis. Some barriers to rotation have been determined (Conradi et ai, 1979). The barrier to rotation of 9.8 + 0.8 kcal mol for the a-cyano-a-methoxybenzyl radical [21] (Korth et al., 1985) could not be interpreted rigorously in terms of a captodative effect because estimates had to be made for the effect of a single captor or donor substituent on the rotational barrier. Within these limitations the barrier does not reflect more than an additive substituent effect. 

The study of the rotational barriers in captodative-substituted radicals leads to the following conclusions the barriers are noticeably lower or higher than in cases of dicaptor or didonor substitution. This can be interpreted as the consequence of a captodative effect in these systems. However, the amount of special influence on the barrier height in energetic terms is small and may sometimes not exceed the numerical uncertainties. A derivation of absolute values for stabilization energies of captodative-substituted radicals by this procedure is not possible, since both ground and transition states are affected by substitution. The lowering of the barriers... 

---