Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bubble merger

Possible Disadvantages Expensive difficult to avoid stagnant regions more subject to immediate bubble merger difficult to clean difficult to modify not advisable for sticky solids requires peripheral seal ports not easily shrouded. [Pg.210]

Figure 12 Comparison of the experimental data from Mukherjee and Dhir [18] and numerical bubble shapes during two bubble merger (fluid water, ATw = 5.0 °C, AT ub = 0.0 °C, g = 1. Oge, spacing =1.5... Figure 12 Comparison of the experimental data from Mukherjee and Dhir [18] and numerical bubble shapes during two bubble merger (fluid water, ATw = 5.0 °C, AT ub = 0.0 °C, g = 1. Oge, spacing =1.5...
Figure 17 Comparison of heat transfer rates for single and three bubble merger cases. Figure 17 Comparison of heat transfer rates for single and three bubble merger cases.
Bubble mergers normal to the heater and along the heater leading to the formation of vapor columns and mushroom type bubbles have been studied. [Pg.214]

Son, G, Ramanujapu, N, and Dhir, V.K. (2002) Numerical simulation of bubble merger process on a single nucleation site during pool nucleate boiling, Jowwa/ of Heat Transfer, Vol. 124, pp. 51-62. [Pg.216]

It is generally accepted that the r-process synthesis of the heavy neutron capture elements in the mass regime A S 130-140 occurs in an environment associated with massive stars. This results from two factors (i) the two most promising mechanisms for r-process synthesis—a neutrino heated hot bubble and neutron star mergers— are both tied to environments associated with core collapse supernovae and (ii) observations of old stars (discussed in Section 1.01.6) confirm the early entry of r-process isotopes into galactic matter. [Pg.13]

Figure 11 Comparison of numerical and experimental bubble shapes during vertical merger [17] (fluid water, AT = 10 C, A l s b = 0.0 "C, g = 1. Oge, < ) = 38 "). Figure 11 Comparison of numerical and experimental bubble shapes during vertical merger [17] (fluid water, AT = 10 C, A l s b = 0.0 "C, g = 1. Oge, < ) = 38 ").
Figure 14 Comparison of experimental and numerical bubble shapes during the merger of two bubbles at low gravity (fluid water, A l = 5 °C, ATa,b = 3 °C, g = O.Olgj, ( ) = 54°, spacing = 7 mm). Figure 14 Comparison of experimental and numerical bubble shapes during the merger of two bubbles at low gravity (fluid water, A l = 5 °C, ATa,b = 3 °C, g = O.Olgj, ( ) = 54°, spacing = 7 mm).
Figure 15 Growth, merger and departure of three bubble in a plane (fluid saturated water, g = O.Olge,... Figure 15 Growth, merger and departure of three bubble in a plane (fluid saturated water, g = O.Olge,...
The merger process is highly nonlinear. A lift force leading to premature departure of bubbles from the heating surface after merger has been identified. [Pg.214]

Mukheqee, A. and Dhir, V.K. (2004) Numerical and experimental study of bubble dynamics associated with lateral merger of vapor bubbles during nucleate pool boiling. In Press, Journal of Heat Tranter. [Pg.216]

In (Tomberg 2000) a combination of the finite element and the level-set methods has been recently used to simulate a merger of two bubbles in a viscous liquid however, the method is restricted to low Reynolds number flows only. [Pg.941]


See other pages where Bubble merger is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.943]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.943]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.945]    [Pg.44]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 , Pg.212 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info