Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Breaking probability water model

The hydrophobic effect is a term describing the influence of relatively nonpolar (lipophilic) substances on the collective behavior of water molecules in their vicinity. The common expression is that water is more structured or organized when in contact with a lipophilic solute. This behavior was observed in a cellular automata model of a solute in water,42,43 which led to a study in more detail.44 The hydrophobic effect was modeled by systematically increasing the breaking probability, PB(WS), value, encoding an increasing probability of a solute molecule, S, not to associate with water. [Pg.224]

The overall temperature dependence of the probability W T) showed a remarkably good agreement with the so-called bond-breaking or mixture model of water structure (Haggis et al. 1952 Luck 1979) with one adjustable parameter only,... [Pg.1505]

A series of rules describing the breaking, / B,and joining, J, probabilities must be selected to operate the cellular automata model. The study of Kier was driven by the rules shown in Table 6.6, where Si and S2 are the two solutes, B, the stationary cells, and W, the solvent (water). The boundary cells, E, of the grid are parameterized to be noninteractive with the water and solutes, i.e., / b(WE) = F b(SE) = 1.0 and J(WE) = J(SE) = 0. The information about the gravity parameters is found in Chapter 2. The characteristics of Si, S2, and B relative to each other and to water, W, can be interpreted from the entries in Table 6.6. [Pg.96]

Several additional studies were carried out to obtain information about the precise behavior of the various components in the model system. The interplay between the manganese porphyrin and the rhodium cofactor was found to be crucial for an efficient catalytic performance of the whole assembly and, hence, their properties were studied in detail at different pH values in vesicle bilayers composed of various types of amphiphiles, viz. cationic (DODAC), anionic (DHP), and zwitterionic (DPPC) [30]. At pH values where the reduced rhodium species is expected to be present as Rh only, the rate of the reduction of 13 by formate increased in the series DPPC < DHP < DODAC, which is in line with an expected higher concentration of formate ions at the surface of the cationic vesicles. The reduction rates of 12 incorporated in the vesicle bilayers catalyzed by 13-formate increased in the same order, because formation of the Rh-formate complex is the rate-determining step in this reduction. When the rates of epoxidation of styrene were studied at pH 7, however, the relative rates were found to be reversed DODAC DPPC < DHP. Apparently, for epoxidation to occur, an efficient supply of protons to the vesicle surface is essential, probably for the step in which the Mn -02 complex breaks down into the active epoxidizing Mn =0 species and water. Using a-pinene as the substrate in the DHP-based system, a turnover number of 360 was observed, which is comparable to the turnover numbers observed for cytochrome P450 itself. [Pg.155]

Figure 10.24 shows that the oil bank breaks through earlier in the model with the Initial 2 data. The initial formation water pH in Initial 2 is about 8.1 compared to 7.4 in Initial 1. Soap is probably generated earlier in Initial 2 than in Initial 1. Thus, the oil bank is formed earlier and breaks through earlier in Initial 2. [Pg.446]

Chandra (Chandra, 2000) investigated the specific role of ions on H-bonds between water molecules using molecular dynamics. The systems chosen were NaCl and KCl in water at various concentrations (from OM to 3.35M). Water molecules were modeled by the extended simple point charge (SPC/E) potential and ions were modeled as charged Lennard-Jones particles. For analyzing the hydrogen bond breaking dynamics, the author calculated the time correlation functions Shb(0 and S HB(f). Shb(0 describes the probability that an initially... [Pg.359]


See other pages where Breaking probability water model is mentioned: [Pg.43]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.860]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.237]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 , Pg.44 ]




SEARCH



Breaking probability

Modelling waters

Probability model

Water break

Water breaking

Water model

Water model modeling

Water models model

© 2024 chempedia.info