Boundary layer equations turbulent kinetic energy

As was the case with the full equations, these contain beside the three mean flow variables u, v, and T (the pressure is, of course, by virtue of Eq. (2.157) again determined by the external in viscid flow) additional terms arising as a result of the turbulence. Therefore, as previously discussed, in order to solve this set of equations, there must be an additional input of information, i.e., a turbulence model must be used. Many turbulence models are based on the turbulence kinetic energy equation that was previously derived. When the boundary layer assumptions are applied to this equation, it becomes ... 

In order to utilize this equation it is necessary to use other equations to describe some of the terms in this equation and/or to model some of the terms in this equation. To illustrate how this is done, attention will be given to two-dimensional boundary layer flow. For two-dimensional boundary layer flows the turbulence kinetic energy equation, Eq. (5.S2), has the following form, some further rearrangement having been undertaken ... 

Substituting Eqs. (5.57) and (5.60) into Eq. (5.53) gives the following modeled form of the turbulent kinetic energy equation for two-dimensional boundary layer flow ... 

Pacanowski and Philander, 1981 Peters et al., 1988). More sophisticated methods are based on prognostic equations for the turbulent kinetic energy k and a second quantity, which is either the dissipation rate e or a length scale in the turbulent flow see Burchard (2002) for a recent review and applications of two-equation turbulence closures for onedimensional water column models. A two-equation turbulent closure has been applied by Omstedt et al. (1983) and Svensson and Omstedt (1990) for the Baltic Sea surface boundary layer under special consideration of sea ice, whereas the application in three-dimensional circulation models is described by Burchard and Bolding (2002) and Meier et al. (2003). 

---