Boundary conditions liquid-solid hydrodynamics

The kinematics and dynamics boundary conditions at the interfaces close the hydrodynamic problem (l)-(2). On the solid-liquid boundary the non-slip boundary conditions are applied -the liquid velocity close to the particle boundary is equal to the velocity of particle motion. In the case of pure liquid phases the non-slip boundary condition is replaced by the dynamic boundary condition. The tangential hydrodynamic forces of the contiguous bulk phases, nx(P+Pb) n, are equal from both sides of the interface, where n is the unit normal of the mathematical dividing surface. The capillary pressure compensates the difference between the... 

Recent times have seen much discussion of the choice of hydrodynamic boundary conditions that can be employed in a description of the solid-liquid interface. For some time, the no-slip approximation was deemed acceptable and has constituted something of a dogma in many fields concerned with fluid mechanics. This assumption is based on observations made at a macroscopic level, where the mean free path of the hquid being considered is much smaller... 

Under the long wavelength and quasistationary approximations and with the use of the linearized forms of the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic boundary conditions, first, we solve the Orr-Sommerfeld equation for the amplitude of perturbed part of the stream function from the Navier-Stokes equations. Second, we solve the equation for the amplitude of perturbed part of the temperature in the liquid film. The dispersion relation for the fluctuation of the solid-liquid interface is determined by the use of these solutions. From the real and imaginary part of this dispersion relation, we obtain the amplification rate cr and the phase velocity =-(7jk as follows ... 

ZoandaAy lubAd.catd.on is a familiar term in the vocabulary of the tribologist. In the general concept of the boundary lubricated condition, the lubricant film between the two surfaces is no longer a liquid layer instead the surfaces are separated by films of only molecular dimensions. Friction is influenced by the nature of the underlying surface and by the chemical constitution of the lubricant films. This view of lubricating action at the solid surface was introduced by Sir W. B. Hardy [1] as an extension of Osborne Reynolds concept that hydrodynamic action within the liquid film is a process treated by continuum methods which are not applicable at the discontinuity or "boundary" between liquid and solid. 

The following treatment, adapted from the work of Van Oene et al. is used to illustrate the assumptions and general conclusions of the surface chemical approach in which the no slip condition is ignored the hydrodynamic boundary condition that for a liquid moving over a solid surface there can be no motion of the liquid immediately adjacent to the liquid/solid interface. The work of Van Oene is similar to that of Schon-horn et al. and at the end of this section we will compare the results of the two investigations. 

However, there exist specific situations where the role of surfaces is not limited to providing a boundary condition for hydrodynamics. For instance in the phenomenon associated with the entry of a solid body into a liquid, the surface wetting properties determine, in addition to the BC, the way the liquid connects to the solid to form the contact line. These kinds of situations are encountered in many civil or military applications, such as ship slamming, air to sea weapons, or all industrial... 

The nature of boundary conditions in hydrodynamics was widely debated in the nineteenth century, and many of the great names in fluid dynamics have expressed an opinion on the subject, as discussed in a recent review. The linear slip boundary condition was introduced by Navier, and this remains a standard characteristic of the slip used today. Helmholtz and von Piotrowski were probably the first to report some evidence of slippage at the solid-liquid interface. We refer the reader to a comprehensive review for detailed accounts of early experimental work. The significance of hydrophobicity for the slip phenomenon does not seem to be recognized at this early stage. 

Young equation. This has remained an unsolved theoretical problem for a long time because of the apparent contradiction between the advancing motion of the contact line and the no slip hydrodynamic boundary condition for the liquid at the solid surface this paradox is solved by a rolling motion of the spreading liquid on the solid surface. ... 

To understand hydrodynamic interactions, the boundary conditions need to be known. In contrast to solid surfaces, liquid-fluid interfaces are mobile. For a mobile interface between two fluid phase A and B, the no-slip boundary condition translates into = V . In particular in a direction tangential to a liquid-fluid interface, the velocities at both sides of the interface must be the same [702-705] ... 

Although the diffusion layer model is the most commonly used, various alterations have been proposed. The current views of the diffusion layer model are based on the so-called effective diffusion boundary layer, the structure of which is heavily dependent on the hydrodynamic conditions, fn this context, Levich [102] developed the convection-diffusion theory and showed that the transfer of the solid to the solution is controlled by a combination of liquid flow and diffusion. In other words, both diffusion and convection contribute to the transfer of drug from the solid surface into the bulk solution, ft should be emphasized that this observation applies even under moderate conditions of stirring. 

---