Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Boundaries scattering function

The scattering function of eqn (12.13) can be extended to the more general case of different materials on either side of the boundary indeed it was originally derived in that form (Somekh et al. 1985). The two sides are denoted by subscripts 1 and 2, having Rayleigh wavenumbers kpi and kp2 with imaginary components ot and a2. Transmission and reflection coefficients Tri, Tr2, and Rri, Rr2 are defined for waves incident from sides 1 and 2, respectively. Then... [Pg.280]

The increase in resistivity at narrow fine widths has been attributed to surface scattering and grain-boundary scattering. The Fuchs and Sondheimer (FS) model attributes the resistivity increase in thin and narrow fines to diffuse scattering of electrons at the exterior surfaces with a probability of 1 — p, where p is the specular scattering coefficient. The length scales in the FS model are the thickness and line width of the conductor and the mean free path A. The simplified expression for resistivity as a function of thickness (T) and linewidth (W) of the conductor is given by ... [Pg.29]

Even though deviations from Matthiessen s rule are known to occur in the presence of grain-boundary scattering, this expression can be used as a good approximation to understand the relative importance of the various effects that influence the resistivity in narrow Cu lines. Figure 2.3 shows the variation of the resistivity as a function of Unewidth for the various components and pxotal-... [Pg.30]

The idealized symmetric blend model is not representative of the behavior of most polymer alloys due to the artificial symmetries invoked. Predictions of spinodal phase boundaries of binary blends of conformationally and interaction potential asymmetric Gaussian thread chains have been worked out by Schwelzer within the R-MMSA and R-MPY/HTA closures and the compressibility route to the thermodynamics. Explicit analytic results can be derived for the species-dependent direct correlation functions > effective chi parameter, small-angle partial collective scattering functions, and spinodal temperature for arbitrary choices of the Yukawa tail potentials. Here we discuss only the spinodal boundary for the simplest Berthelot model of the Umm W t il potentials discussed in Section V. For simplicity, the A and B polymers are taken to have the same degree of polymerization N. [Pg.80]

Figure 8.10 shows thermal conductivity of three elements (C, Si, and Ge) as a function of temperature. The general trend of thermal conductivity is similar for all materials. At low temperature, normal scattering processes do not affect the thermal conductivity. Defect and boundary scattering are independent of temperature. Therefore, the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity only arises from the heat capacity and follows the expected behavior. The heat capacity becomes constant at higher temperature and mean free path decreases. Therefore, the thermal conductivity at higher temperature shows approximately T behavior. [Pg.320]

Mandelshtam V A and Taylor H S 1995 A simple recursion polynomial expansion of the Green s function with absorbing boundary conditions. Application to the reactive scattering J. Chem. Phys. 102... [Pg.2325]

Until very recently, however, the same could not be said for reactive systems, which we define to be systems in which the nuclear wave function satisfies scattering boundary conditions. It was understood that, as in a bound system, the nuclear wave function of a reactive system must encircle the Cl if nontrivial GP effects are to appear in any observables [6]. Mead showed how to predict such effects in the special case that the encirclement is produced by the requirements of particle-exchange symmetry [14]. However, little was known about the effect of the GP when the encirclement is produced by reaction paths that loop around the CL... [Pg.2]

This chapter has focused on reactive systems, in which the nuclear wave function satisfies scattering boundary conditions, applied at the asymptotic limits of reagent and product channels. It turns out that these boundary conditions are what make it possible to unwind the nuclear wave function from around the Cl, and that it is impossible to unwind a bound-state wave function. [Pg.36]

Recursion Polynomial Expansion of the Green s Function with Absorbing Boundary Conditions. Application to the Reactive Scattering. [Pg.339]

In the cellular multiple scattering model , finite clusters of atoms are subjected to condensed matter boundary conditions in such a manner that a continuous spectrum is allowed. They are therefore not molecular calculations. An X type of exchange was used to create a local potential and different potentials for up and down spin-states could be constructed. For uranium pnictides and chalcogenides compounds the clusters were of 8 atoms (4 metal, 4 non-metal). The local density of states was calculated directly from the imaginary part of the Green function. The major features of the results are ... [Pg.282]

The basis vector is parallel and is perpendicular to the scattering plane. Note, however, that Es and E, are specified relative to different sets of basis vectors. Because of the linearity of the boundary conditions (3.7) the amplitude of the field scattered by an arbitrary particle is a linear function of the amplitude of the incident field. The relation between incident and scattered fields is conveniently written in matrix form... [Pg.63]

The boundary conditions (4.39), the orthogonality of the vector harmonics, and the form of the expansion of the incident field dictate the form of the expansions for the scattered field and the field inside the sphere the coefficients in these expansions vanish for all m = = 1. Finiteness at the origin requires that we take y (kjr), where kj is the wave number in the sphere, as the appropriate spherical Bessel functions in the generating functions for the vector harmonics inside the sphere. Thus, the expansion of the field (Ej,H,) is... [Pg.93]


See other pages where Boundaries scattering function is mentioned: [Pg.239]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.1158]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.6]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.280 ]




SEARCH



Scattering function

Wave function scattering boundary conditions

© 2024 chempedia.info