Binding energy electrostatic

MD simulations of electrolytes for lithium batteries retain the atomistic representation of the electrolyte molecules but do not treat electrons explicitly. Instead the influence of electrons on intermolecular interactions is subsumed into the description of the interatomic interactions that constitute the atomistic potential or force field. The interatomic potential used in MD simulations is made up of dispersion/ repulsion terms. Coulomb interactions described by partial atomic charges, and in some cases, dipole polarizability described by atom-based polarizabilities. The importance of explicit inclusion of polarization effects is considered below. In the most accurate force fields, interatomic potentials are informed by high-level QC calculations. Specifically, QC calculations provide molecular geometries, conformational energetic, binding energies, electrostatic potential distributions, and dipole polarizabilities that can be used to parameterize atomic force fields. 

Gilson M K and B Honig 1988. Calculation of the Total Electrostatic Energy of a Macromoleculai System Solvation Energies, Binding Energies and Conformational Analysis. Proteins Structure Function and Genetics 4 7-18. 

MK Gilson, B Homg. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system Solution energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins 4 7-18, 1988. 

We see that, in (134), depending on the relative binding energies, the value of J may be positive or negative. In a particular case we may find J equal to zero. This condition could be satisfied only at a particular temperature, since the electrostatic energy in the ionic field is sensitive to temperature. 

Table 1. Average ligand-surrounding interaction energies, electrostatic corrections and observed binding free energies (kcal/mol) for the eight thrombin inhibitors (from Ref. 46). b...

---