Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Basic propagators

We start by noting the basic differences between the perturbative approaches to the RHEG and vacuum QED as discussed in Appendix B. While the Hamiltonian of the RHEG, H , is identical to that of vacuum QED, the ground state lO) of the RHEG represents a gas of electrons with finite density Hq, in contrast to the ground state 0) of vacuum QED. As a consequence the fermion propagator, [Pg.599]

Most information concerning the RHEG required in the present context is contained in the response functions of the RHEG. In our notation the time-ordered current response functions (n-point functions) are defined as [Pg.600]

For the time-independent systems of interest here a partial Fourier transformation of is advantageous. [Pg.600]

The static response functions utilized in Appendix D are then obtained by taking the zero-frequency limit, [Pg.601]

For the case of the RHEG further Fourier transformation is useful, [Pg.601]


To justify the basic propagation equation (5.14) or (5.19), it is essential that there be no reflections from interfaces. This means that either the individual layers be coated for broadband antireflection or that the incremental change of optical properties p. cp across an interface is small. [Pg.226]

Although we can continue with more atoms per propagation unit, it is easy to show that aU of those are related to the four basic propagation units found in the solid state (and depicted in 1.3.1.), to wit ... [Pg.9]

We thus conclude that structures of solids are based, in general, upon four basic propagation units, which are stacked in a symmetrical and spacefilling form to near infinity. Variation of structure in solids depends upon whether the other atoms forming the structure are larger or smaller than... [Pg.9]

The quantities k , k,p, kpp, and kp, are the rate constants of the four basic propagation reactions of copolymerization. The Stockmayer distribution function takes into account only a chemical polydispersity resulting fi om the statistical nature of copolymerization reactions. This means that all units of all chains are formed under identical conditions. If a monomer is removed from the reacting mixture at a rate which changes the monomer concentration ratio, the monomer concentration will drift, forming a copolymer which varies in the average composition and is broader in the chemical distribution. No such chemical polydispersity can be described by the Stockmayer distribution. Therefore, Eq. (84) has to be restricted in its application to random copolymers synthesized at very low conversions or under azeotropic conditions. For azeotropic copolymers, the feed monomer concentrations [a ] and are chosen in such a way that the second factor on the right-hand side of the basic relation of copolymerization kinetics... [Pg.70]

Introduction Basic Propagation Models Field Strength Prediction Models Statistical Distributions of the Received Envelope Radio Coverage Summary and Conclusions... [Pg.1667]

Some Considerations on the Basic Propagation Models Free-Space Model... [Pg.1759]

Before closing this overview one may mention the attempts to exploit the error structure generated by the P discretization Eq. (19) to eliminate low-order errors [61], which somehow lead to alternative expressions for the basic propagators. [Pg.66]

The basics of the method are simple. Reflections occur at all layers in the subsurface where an appreciable change in acoustic impedance is seen by the propagating wave. This acoustic impedance is the product of the sonic velocity and density of the formation. There are actually different wave types that propagate in solid rock, but the first arrival (i.e. fastest ray path) is normally the compressional or P wave. The two attributes that are measured are... [Pg.18]

D is basically a succession of 2D or 3D surveys repeated at intervals of time during which it is expected that some production effect has occurred, of sufficient magnitude to effect the acoustic impedance contrast seen by the propagating waves. For example, this oould be changes in the water or gas saturation, or changes in pressure. [Pg.20]

It turns out that one cannot propagate Y using standard numerical methods because Y blows up whenever g is zero. To circumvent this one must propagate Y by invariant imbedding . The basic idea here is to construct a propagator Y which satisfies... [Pg.986]

The nebulization concept has been known for many years and is commonly used in hair and paint spays and similar devices. Greater control is needed to introduce a sample to an ICP instrument. For example, if the highest sensitivities of detection are to be maintained, most of the sample solution should enter the flame and not be lost beforehand. The range of droplet sizes should be as small as possible, preferably on the order of a few micrometers in diameter. Large droplets contain a lot of solvent that, if evaporated inside the plasma itself, leads to instability in the flame, with concomitant variations in instrument sensitivity. Sometimes the flame can even be snuffed out by the amount of solvent present because of interference with the basic mechanism of flame propagation. For these reasons, nebulizers for use in ICP mass spectrometry usually combine a means of desolvating the initial spray of droplets so that they shrink to a smaller, more uniform size or sometimes even into small particles of solid matter (particulates). [Pg.106]


See other pages where Basic propagators is mentioned: [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1757]    [Pg.1757]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1757]    [Pg.1757]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.2865]    [Pg.2868]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.223]   


SEARCH



Propagation of autoignition basic modelling considerations

© 2024 chempedia.info