Convergence, asymptotic

The CBS models use the known asymptotic convergence of pair natural orbital expansions to extrapolate from calculations using a finite basis set to the estimated complete basis set limit. See Appendix A for more details on this technique. 

Petersson and coworkers have extended this two-electron formulation of asymptotic convergence to many-electron atoms. They note that the second-order MoUer-Plesset correlation energy for a many-electron system may be written as a sum of pair energies, each describing the energetic effect of the electron correlation between that pair of electrons ... 

In natural orbital form, the asymptotic convergence of has been shown to have the following form, resulting in the CBS limit, ef fCBS) ... 

Ursin, B. (1980). Asymptotic convergence properties of the extended Kalman filter using filtered state estimates. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-25, 1207-1211. 

Thus, Ci+i/ci will approach the above stated limit. In practice, asymptotic convergence is rapid, and Kci is indistinguishable from one thus, c,+i equals r, at equilibrium. This would mean that the equilibrium length distribution will be uniform rather than peaked as shown in Fig. 7. 

In most articles related to approximation theory, or to asymptotic convergence rates, a pseudo-function O(x) is prominently used. We call it a pseudo-function, since it does not identify a specific function, but rather a norm of behaviour to which other functions are compared. Specifically, the following expressions are used ... 

Suppose you want to solve the equation x = e z on a pocket calculator. Suggest a simple method, and verify that it works by working out its asymptotic convergence properties What is the convergence order If this is a first-order procedure, what is the convergence rate A d= lim 001j Show that the NR method, applied as f(x) = x - e x = 0, takes the form... 

In practice, the asymptotic convergence order in not so important. For a large system it takes so many iterations to reach the asymptotic behaviour, that convergence to machine accuracy has occurred much earlier. Of prime importance is instead to have a good enough approximation to the true Hessian. 

Realizing that Eq. (13) gives an explicit solution of (1) with an appropriate V, in terms of logarithmic derivatives, it is possible to identify u with the well-known Jost solution denoted as/(r, 2), see more below and Ref. [44], which here must be proportional to the Weyl s solution x(f, )- With this identification, we obtain the generalized Titchmarsh formula (generalized since it applies to all asymptotically convergent exponential-type solutions commensurate with Weyl s limit point classification)... 

Complete Basis Set Methods Petersson et al.61-63 developed a series of methods, referred to as complete basis set (CBS) methods, for the evaluation of accurate energies of molecular systems. The central idea in the CBS methods is an extrapolation procedure to determine the projected second-order (MP2) energy in the limit of a complete basis set. This extrapolation is performed pair by pair for all the valence electrons and is based on the asymptotic convergence properties of pair correlation energies for two-electron systems in a natural orbital expansion. As in G2 theory, the higher order correlation contributions are evaluated by a sequence of calculations with a variety of basis sets. 

The problem of convergence of the series eq. (1.53) and eq. (1.54) will not be addressed here. In general terms it can be said that only the so-called asymptotic convergence of the latter can possibly be assumed. Moreover, in most cases of quantum chemical interest, A is not a true variable of the problem as it cannot be changed in any physical experiment, but is only an accounting tool. In this case the result is obtained by setting A = 1 at the end of the calculation. Then of course... 

Equations (4.3-4) and (4.3-5) are the first of several important limit theorems that establish conditions for asymptotic convergence to normal distributions as the sample space grows large. Such results are known as central limit theorems, because the convergence is strongest when the random variable is near its central (expectation) value. The following two theorems of Lindeberg (1922) illustrate why normal distributions are so widely useful. 

Rigorously speaking, this expansion is only correct when the separation of the interacting species is much larger than their size. Thus, in real systems it can only be asymptotically convergent. Still, it is useful as it dictates the correct dependence on distance of the potential, at least for large distances. 

Convergence of these kind of formal expansions is questionable, however, it is believed today that at least asymptotic convergence behavior is to expected. Collecting terms in equations (21) and (22) that are proportional to the same power of X and p on the left and right hand sides we obtain recursion formulas... 

Re Entries [8]-[ll], Refs. [2], [8], [10], and [11]) As per Entries [8]—[11], results for the Hubble constant have improved with time, asymptotically converging onto those provided by Ref. [11]. The results for the Hubble constant as per Ref. [8] are in essential agreement with Entry [9]. The history of values of the Hubble constant also is briefly discussed in Entry [9] and Ref. [10]. Reference [10] surveys the history of values of the Hubble constant determined via work done through 2012. Reference [10] was for sale at the 27th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, held at the Fairmont Hotel in Dallas, Texas, December 8-13, 2013. 

Thus, according to (4-34), the difference between T and its asymptotic expansion can be made arbitrarily small for any fixed N by taking the limit e 0. It is very important to recognize that asymptotic convergence does not imply that a better approximation will be achieved by taking more terms for any fixed e, even if e is small. Indeed, it is possible that the difference between Tand its asymptotic expansion may actually diverge as we add more terms while holding e fixed. 

Here the gauge function for the first term must be independent of s because C = 1 at the boundary 7=0. Note again that asymptotic convergence requires that... 

Higher-order terms to 0(Re3) were obtained by Chester and Breach.11 It is disappointing, but fairly typical of asymptotic approximations, that the calculation of many terms achieves a relatively small increase in the range of Reynolds number in which the drag can be evaluated accurately compared with (9 122). We may recall that asymptotic convergence is achieved by taking the limit Re 0 for a fixed number of terms in the expansion, rather than an increasing number of terms for some fixed value of Re. 

Nyden, M. R. Petersson, G. A. (1981). Complete basis set energies. I. The asymptotic convergence of paimatural orbital expansions, J. Chem. Phys., 75, pp. 1843-1862. 

This definition is consistent with the example shown earher. A necessary condition for asymptotic convergence is given by... 

Suppose the expansion of r(x,e) is desired in a domain Q. If the asymptotic convergence occnrs for all x in Q, the expansion is said to be a regular asymptotic expansion. 

Naturally, approximation generally improves with increasing n the law of large numbers [90,107-109] assures us that this procedure asymptotically converges [and all other central moments of/(z)] thus we are assured that... 

---