Angular functions symmetry relations

The spin (angular momentum) quantum number ms. In their interpretation of many features of atomic spectra Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925) proposed for the electron a new property called spin angular momentum (or simply spin) and assumed that only two states of spin were possible. In relativistic (four-dimensional) quantum mechanics this quantum number is related to the symmetry properties of the wave function and may have one of the two values designated as A. 

Since the number of electrons in the lN configuration is uniquely determined by the value of the z-projection of quasispin momentum, then the quasispin method provides us with a common approach to the spin-angular parts of the wave functions of partially and almost filled shells that differ only by the sign of that z-projection. The phase relations between various quantities will then uniquely follow from the symmetry... 

In eq. (12), R(o) is the function operator that corresponds to the (2-D) configuration-space symmetry operator R(o). In eq. (13), /3 is the infinitesimal generator of rotations about z (eq. (8)) exp(i /3) is the operator [/do)] in accordance with the general prescription eq. (3.5.7). Notice that a positive sign inside the exponential in eq. (2) would also satisfy the commutation relations (CRs), but the sign was chosen to be negative in order that /3 could be identified with the angular momentum about z, eq. (6). 

Matrix dements between atomic orbitals can be defined in terms of spherical harmonics based on an axis along the inteinuclear separation, as indicated at (a) in the upper left. There, tine lower state is an hi = 0 p orbital and the upper state is an m = 0 d orbital, which has angular dependence as 3 f(2 /r ) — l/3]/2. For other d orbitals (hi 0), it is easy to visualize other cartesian forms, such as the symmetry z.v/c shown at (e) or the xy/r shown at (f), which lead to the same values for the matrix elements as do the spherical harmonics. There is only one independent sd matrix element for it, the different cases indicated at (c) in the upper right can be related by algebraic manipulation or the transformations described in Eq. (19-21). The two independent pd matrix elements are shown at (a) and (b) and the three independent dd matrix elements arc shown at (d), (e), and (f). Signs of the wave functions arc chosen such that all but and Vjj, are expected to be negative. 

In the usual procedure a classical Hamiltonian function for the model is formulated. Attention should be given to the choice of the molecular coordinate system. As the frame and top are rigid, a convenient choice is the principal axis system of the whole molecule.8 As a consequence of the symmetry of the top, the orientation of the coordinate system within the molecule is independent of the torsion angle. Another choice, which is called the internal axis system, is defined in such a way that the angular momenta produced by internal rotation of the top and frame compensate each other.10 The Hamiltonian functions in both coordinate systems are related by a contact transformation, which guarantees the invariance of Poisson brackets11 and, subsequently, of the commutation relations. 

If the group is rotational or helical and ij> is not 5-type, then the />, on each site become linear combinations of basis functions related by the rotation matrix of the appropriate angular momentum and the appropriate rotational or helical step angle [27]. It is traditional to use Cartesian-Gaussian orbital basis sets in quantum-chemical calculations [28], but solid-spherical-harmonic Gaussians [29] are best for symmetry adaption and matrix element evaluation. Including an extra factor of (-)M in the definition of the solid spherical harmonics [30]... 

This contribution examines current approaches to Coulomb few-body problems mainly from a methodological perspective, in contrast to recent reviews which have focused on the results obtained for benchmark problems. The methods under discussion here employ wavefunctions which explicitly involve all the interparticle coordinates and use functional forms appropriate to nonadiabatic systems in which all the particles are of comparable mass. The use of such wavefunctions for states of arbitrary angular symmetry is reviewed, and the kinetic-energy operator, written in the interparticle coordinates, is presented in a convenient form. Evaluation of the resultant angular matrix elements is discussed in detail. For exponentially correlated wavefunctions, problems of integral evaluation are surveyed, the relatively new analytical procedures are summarized, and relations among matrix elements are presented. The current status of Gaussian-orbital and Hylleraas methods is also reviewed. 

---